Soil carbon sequestration: an innovative strategy for reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration
Abstract
Global warming due to increasing greenhouse gases emission and the subsequent climatic changes are the most serious environmental challenges faced by environmental scientists, academicians, regulatory agencies and policy makers worldwide. Among the various greenhouse gases, CO2 constitutes a major share and its concentration is increasing rapidly. Therefore, there is perhaps an urgent need to formulate suitable policies and programs that can firmly reduce and sequester CO2 emissions in a sustainable way. In order to combat the predicted disaster due to rising CO2 level, several CO2 capture and storage technologies and medium are being widely pursued and deliberated. Among them soil carbon sequestration (SCS) is gaining global attention because of its stability and role in long-term surface reservoir, natural low cost and eco-friendly means to combat climate change. Apart from the carbon capturing, the process of soil carbon stabilization also provides other tangible benefits that includes achieving food security, by improving soil quality, wasteland reclamation and preventing soil erosion. The present article aimed to address all these concerns and provide strategies and critical research needs to implement SCS as a mitigation option for increasing atmospheric CO2 level and its future directions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various land management practices promote soil carbon sequestration, including cropping system intensity and rotation, zero-tillage and conservation tillage, nutrient management, mulching, use of crop residues and manure, incorporation of biochar, use of organic fertilizers, and water management.
“Various land management practices that promote soil carbon sequestration are discussed in the literature which include cropping system intensity and rotation practices, zero-tillage and conservation tillage practices, nutrient management, mulching and use of crop residues and manure, incorporation of biochar, use of organic fertilizers and water management (Royal-Society 2018;Srivastava 2012;Faroo”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Srivastava 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 170 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Srivastava, P., Kumar, A., Behera, S. K., Sharma, Y. K., & Singh, N.
- Affiliations
- National Botanical Research Institute (IN)
- University of Lucknow (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Behera, Soumit K.
- Venue
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Published
- 2012-01-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1343-1358
- ISSN
- 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9710
- OpenAlex
- W1967204656
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil carbon sequestration, atmospheric CO2, climate change mitigation, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon stabilization, food security, soil quality, wasteland reclamation, soil erosion control, carbon capture and storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review