Cited by 32Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Long-term decline of a winter-resident bird community in Puerto Rico

Faaborg, John, Arendt, Wayne J., Toms, Judith D., Dugger, Katie M., Cox, W. Andrew, Canals Mora, Miguel·2013·Biodiversity and Conservation

Abstract

Despite concern expressed two decades ago, there has been little recent discussion about continuing declines of migrant bird populations. Monitoring efforts have been focused almost exclusively on the breeding grounds. We describe the long-term decline of a winter-resident bird population in Guánica Commonwealth Forest, Puerto Rico, one of the last remaining tracts of high-quality tropical dry forests in the Caribbean. The winter bird community has exhibited dramatic declines, with constant-effort mist netting now capturing about one-third as many birds as it did 20 years ago. Population estimates for the three most common species have declined dramatically, even though survival rates have remained constant, and other species are now virtually absent from a site where they once were fairly common. Although explanations for these declines are speculative, particularly because they involve multiple species, we argue that the strength and duration of these declines in well-preserved dry forest within a biosphere reserve should stimulate renewed discussion of migrant population trends and comparison with other recent monitoring activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10531-012-0399-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Guanica dry forest in southwestern Puerto Rico, mist-net data indicate that dry season bird populations dropped by two-thirds over two decades.

    “in the Guanica dry forest in southwestern Puerto Rico mist-net data indicate that dry season bird populations dropped by two-thirds over two decades (86).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faaborg, J., Arendt, W. J., Toms, J. D., Dugger, K. M., Cox, W. A., & Canals Mora, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Faaborg, John
Venue
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2012-11-25
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
63-75
ISSN
  • 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9710
OpenAlex
W2019803563
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
bird population decline, long-term population monitoring, mist netting, tropical dry forest, Puerto Rico, population estimates, survival rate, species absence, biosphere reserves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review