Cited by 123Rangeland Management and Livestock EcologyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Global plight of native temperate grasslands: going, going, gone?

Open access
Carbutt, Clinton, Henwood, William D., Gilfedder, Louise A.·2017·Biodiversity and Conservation

Abstract

The indelible imprint of humanity is credited for the major degradation of natural systems worldwide. Nowhere are the transforming qualities of mankind more apparent than in the native temperate grassland regions of the world. Formerly occupying some 9 million km², or 8% of the planet’s terrestrial surface, native temperate grasslands have been reduced to vestiges of their former glory. Only 4.6% are conserved globally within protected areas—a testament to being the least protected and the most extensively transformed of the world’s terrestrial biomes. The aim of this paper is to continue promoting the conservation value of native temperate grasslands, and reiterate the need for further protection and sustainable management before further losses and inadequate protection undermine ecological integrity any further. A new strategic direction is presented for the next decade, underpinned by ten key focus areas. The most realistic opportunities to improve protection lie in central, eastern and western Asia where landscape-scale tracts of native temperate grassland remain in reasonable condition. Such a course necessitates a strong reliance on integrating sustainable use and conservation by promoting concepts such as Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas as legitimate and recognized forms of protected areas. Here the conservation value of working rangeland landscapes utilised by nomadic pastoralists comes to the fore. The naive and short-sighted approach to viewing native tempe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10531-017-1398-5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Key human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems, reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and fuelwood extraction in savannahs.

    “The key human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems (Section 2.3) (27), reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and-in savannahs-fuelwood extraction (4,31).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Less than 5% of global temperate grasslands are protected.

    “Less than 5% of global temperate grasslands are protected (27).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes.

    “natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes in the world (27,28).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Restoring Degraded Lands

    Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

    “Sustainable land management (SLM): the stewardship and use of land resources to meet changing human needs, while simultaneously ensuring the longterm productive potential of these resources and the maintenance of their environmental functions 8% of the land surface, natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fr…”
    Background

Authors
Carbutt, C., Henwood, W. D., & Gilfedder, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (ZA)
  • IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (CH)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Carbutt, Clinton
Venue
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2017-07-07
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
2911-2932
ISSN
  • 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9710
OpenAlex
W2727388543
Cited by
123
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
grassland degradation, grassland conservation, protected areas, Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas, sustainable rangeland management, nomadic pastoralism, working landscapes, conservation strategies, Asia, ecosystem services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review