The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of methodologies for extracting plant-available and amorphous Si from soils and aquatic sediments
Open accessAbstract
There is a variety of methodologies used in the aquatic sciences and soil sciences for extracting different forms of Si from sediments and soils. However, a comparison of the published extraction techniques is lacking. Here we review the methodologies used to extract different Si fractions from soils and sediments. Methods were classified in those to assess plant-available Si and those to extract Si from amorphous silica and allophane. Plant-available Si is supposed to comprise silicic acid in soil solution and adsorbed to soil particles. Extraction techniques for plant-available Si include extractions with water, CaCl2, acetate, acetic acid, phosphate, H2SO3, H2SO4, and citrate. The extractants show different capabilites to desorb silicic acid, with H2SO3, H2SO4 and citrate having the greater extraction potential. The most common extractants to dissolve amorphous silica from soils and aquatic sediments are NaOH and Na2CO3, but both also dissolve crystalline silicates to varying degrees. In soils moreover Tiron is used to dissolve amorphous silica, while oxalate is used to dissolve allophanes and imogolite-type materials. Most techniques analyzing for biogenic silica in aquatic environments use a correction method to identify mineral derived Si. By contrast, in the soil sciences no correction methods are used although pedologists are well aware of the overestimation of amorphous silica by the NaOH extraction, which is most commonly used to extract silica from soils. It is recommended that soil scientists begin to use the techniques developed in the aquatic sciences, since it seems impossible to extract amorphous Si from soils completely without dissolving some of the crystalline silicates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, Z., Song, Z., & Cornelis, J.-T. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00529 · Cited by 1,912
Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: A review
Adrees, M., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Ibrahim, M., Abbas, F., Farid, M., Qayyum, M. F., & Irshad, M. K. (2015) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.011 · Cited by 828
Silicon pools and fluxes in soils and landscapes—a review
Sommer, M., Kaczorek, D., Kuzyakov, Y., & Breuer, J. (2006) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200521981 · Cited by 637
Self-citationTubana, B. S., Babu, T., & Datnoff, L. E. (2016) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/ss.0000000000000179 · Cited by 392
A contemporary overview of silicon availability in agricultural soils
Haynes, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201400202 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Sauer, D., Saccone, L., Conley, D. J., Herrmann, L., & Sommer, M.
- Venue
- Biogeochemistry
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-108
- ISSN
- 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-515X
- OpenAlex
- W1983421662
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of methodologies for extracting plant-available and amorphous Si from soils and aquatic sediments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10533-005-5879-3
- The paper
- Sauer, D., Saccone, L., Conley, D. J., Herrmann, L., & Sommer, M. (2006). Review of methodologies for extracting plant-available and amorphous Si from soils and aquatic sediments. Biogeochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-5879-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.