Cited by 392Silicon Effects in AgriculturePlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Silicon in Soils and Plants and Its Role in US Agriculture: History and Future Perspectives

Open access
Tubana, Brenda S., Babu, Tapasya, Datnoff, Lawrence E.·2016·Soil Science

Abstract

Silicon (Si) is the second most abundant element in the earth’s crust and plays a number of important roles in the mineral nutrition of plants. In the past 20 years, the scientific documentation on the benefits of Si to crops has helped establish Si fertilization as an agronomic practice in many agricultural lands worldwide. However, very little information has been consolidated on the use of Si specifically for US agriculture. Consequently, the objectives of this review are to provide (1) information on the dynamics of Si in soil, use, and sources; (2) a history and up-to-date documentation on Si-related research in many areas of US production agriculture; and (3) perspectives on Si as a plant beneficial nutrient and the potential of Si fertilization as an agronomic practice in US crop production systems. The Si-driven mechanisms enhancing the productivity of a wide array of crops under stressed conditions are discussed in this review. Based on the recent 10-year average production level and published shoot Si content, the principal crops grown in the United States can collectively take up 9.55 million tons of Si annually, whereas the annual Si removal rate for the entire US cropland area is estimated at 21.1 million tons. On the basis of this projected annual Si removal rate, adoption of continuous intensive farming systems in the country, low solubility of soil Si, and complex chemical dynamics of Si in soil, increasing plant-available Si levels through fertilization is therefore foreseen a logical agronomic practice for US agriculture.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ss.0000000000000179

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Requirement for mining may be further reduced by utilizing artificial silicate by-products from industrial processes, including calcium-rich silicates produced by iron and steel manufacturing (slags) with a long history of agricultural usage.

    “Requirement for mining may be further reduced by utilizing artificial silicate by-products from industrial processes 37,38 , including calcium-rich silicates produced by iron and steel manufacturing (slags) with a long history of agricultural usage 4,39 .”
  • Undertaking ERW practices with these materials addresses a critical need to fertilise soils with silica and other nutrients lost by harvesting that gradually depletes plant-available pools.

    “Undertaking ERW practices with these materials addresses a critical need to fertilise soils with silica and other nutrients lost by harvesting that gradually depletes plant-available pools 39 .”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Clements, 1965a, The roles of calcium silicate slag in sugar cane growth, Reps. Hawaiian. Sugar Tech, 25, 103
  2. Clements, 1965b, Effects of silicate on the growth and freckle of sugar cane in Hawaii, Porto Rico. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol, 12, 197
  3. Cloyd, 2009, Are silicon-based fertilizer applications “really” effective against insect pests?, FloriBytes, 3, 1
  4. Dadkhah, 2006, The effect of salinity on growth, inorganic ions and dry matter partitioning in sugar beet cultivars, J. Agric. Sci. Technol, 8, 199
  5. Dann, 2002, Peas grown in media with elevated plant-available silicon levels have higher activities of chitinases and β-1, 3-glucanase, are less susceptible to a fungal leaf spot pathogen and accumulate more foliar silicon, Australas. Plant Pathol, 31, 9, 10.1071/AP01047 · DOI
  6. Datnoff, 1994, Comparison of silicon and benomyl alone and in combination for reducing blast incidence, Biol. Cultural Tests Control Plant Diseases, 9, 113
  7. Elawad, 1979, Silicon and the rice plant environment: A review of recent research, Il Riso, 28, 235
  8. Elawad, 1982, Response of sugarcane to silicate source and rate, I. Growth and yield. Agron. J, 74, 481
  9. Faimon, 1998, The kinetics of the release of silicon and aluminum from aluminosilicates into aqueous mildly acid solutions, Scripta. Fac. Sci. Nat. Univ. Masaryk Brun. (Brno. Czeck Rep, 25, 59
  10. Hallmark, 1982, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 15, 263
  11. Hawley, 2004, Wollastonite, Mining Engineering, 56, 52
  12. Haysom, 1975, Some aspects of the calcium silicate trials at Mackay, Proc. Aust. Sugar Cane Technol, 42, 117
  13. Hurney, 1973, A progress report on the calcium silicate investigations, Proc. Aust. Sugar Cane Technol, 40, 109
  14. Imaizumi, 1958, Edaphological studies on silicon supplying power of paddy soils, Bull. Natl. Inst. Agric. Sci. B, 8, 261
  15. Latshaw, 1924, Elemental composition of corn plant. J, Ag Research, 27, 845
  16. Matichenkov, 1999, Silicon fertilizers for citrus in Florida, Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc, 112, 5
  17. Raghupathy, 1993, Effect of lignite fly ash on rice, Int. Rice Res. Notes, 18, 27
  18. Sauer, 2000, Chemical processes in soils on artificial materials: Silicate dissolution, occurrence of amorphous silica and zeolites, Proceedings of First International Conference on Soils of Urban, Industrial, Traffic and Mining Areas, Essen, 1, 339
  19. Schachtschabe, 1967, Wasserlo sliche Kieselsa ure in Lo ßbo den, Z Pflanzenern Bodenk, 118, 22
  20. Sebastian, 2012, Silica SLV Results, presented at the Association of American Plant Food Control Officials Lab Services Committee Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2012., (accessed May, 8, 2012
  21. Takahashi, 1981, Effect of slags on the growth and the silicon uptake by rice plant and the available silicates in paddy soil, Bull. Nat. L. Shikoku Agric. Exp. Stn, 38, 75
  22. Tubana, 2012, Impact of silicon fertilization to sugarcane grown on alluvial soils in Louisiana, J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Tech, 32, 75
  23. Vasanthi, 2012a, Silicon in day today life, World Appl. Sci. J, 17, 1425
  24. Virta, 2004, WollastoniteU., S Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook, 82, 1
  25. Wagner, 1940, Die Bedeutung der Kieselsäure für das Wachstum einiger Kulturpflanzen, ihren Nähestoffhaushalt und ihre Anfälligkeit gegen echte Mehtaupilze, Phytopathol. Z, 12, 427

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tubana, B. S., Babu, T., & Datnoff, L. E.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US)
Venue
Soil Science
Published
2016-09
Volume
181
Issue
9/10
Pages
393-411
ISSN
0038-075X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2534924669
Cited by
392
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
32.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Soil Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Silicon Effects in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
silicon, silicon fertilization, United States agriculture, cropping systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review