Cited by 2,365Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?

Cleveland, Cory C., Liptzin, Daniel·2007·Biogeochemistry

Abstract

Well-constrained carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) ratios in planktonic biomass, and their importance in advancing our understanding of biological processes and nutrient cycling in marine ecosystems, has motivated ecologists to search for similar patterns in terrestrial ecosystems. Recent analyses indicate the existence of “Redfield-like” ratios in plants, and such data may provide insight into the nature of nutrient limitation in terrestrial ecosystems. We searched for analogous patterns in the soil and the soil microbial biomass by conducting a review of the literature. Although soil is characterized by high biological diversity, structural complexity and spatial heterogeneity, we found remarkably consistent C:N:P ratios in both total soil pools and the soil microbial biomass. Our analysis indicates that, similar to marine phytoplankton, element concentrations of individual phylogenetic groups within the soil microbial community may vary, but on average, atomic C:N:P ratios in both the soil (186:13:1) and the soil microbial biomass (60:7:1) are well-constrained at the global scale. We did see significant variation in soil and microbial element ratios between vegetation types (i.e., forest versus grassland), but in most cases, the similarities in soil and microbial element ratios among sites and across large scales were more apparent than the differences. Consistent microbial biomass element ratios, combined with data linking specific patterns of microbial element stoichiometry with direct evidence of microbial nutrient limitation, suggest that measuring the proportions of C, N and P in the microbial biomass may represent another useful tool for assessing nutrient limitation of ecosystem processes in terrestrial ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D.
Affiliations
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US)
Corresponding author
Cleveland, Cory C.
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
2007-07-31
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
235-252
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W2041383474
Cited by
2,365
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 182 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 196 · 2023: 220 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 225 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 67
FWCI
39.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
C:N:P stoichiometry, Redfield ratio, soil microbial biomass, soil nutrients, nutrient limitation, terrestrial ecosystems, phytoplankton stoichiometry, nutrient cycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review