Cited by 309Forest Management and PolicyEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityAgricultural and Food Sciences

Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns

Open access
Lippke, Bruce, Oneil, Elaine, Harrison, Rob, Skog, Kenneth, Gustavsson, Leif, Sathre, Roger·2011·Carbon Management

Abstract

This review on research on life cycle carbon accounting examines the complexities in accounting for carbon emissions given the many different ways that wood is used. Recent objectives to increase the use of renewable fuels have raised policy questions, with respect to the sustainability of managing our forests as well as the impacts of how best to use wood from our forests. There has been general support for the benefits of sustainably managing forests for carbon mitigation as expressed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007. However, there are many integrated carbon pools involved, which have led to conflicting implications for best practices and policy. In particular, sustainable management of forests for products produces substantially different impacts than a focus on a single stand or on specific carbon pools with each contributing to different policy implications. In this article, we review many recent research findings on carbon impacts across all stages of processing from cradle-to-grave, based on life cycle accounting, which is necessary to understand the carbon interactions across many different carbon pools. The focus is on where findings are robust and where uncertainties may be large enough to question key assumptions that impact carbon in the forest and its many uses. Many opportunities for reducing carbon emissions are identified along with unintended consequences of proposed policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4155/cmt.11.24

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wood products have potential as long-term stores of carbon, particularly when used in long-lived buildings, the lifespans of which can be conservatively estimated at 80-100 years.

    “Wood products have potential as long-term stores of carbonparticularly when used in long-lived buildings, the lifespans of which can be conservatively estimated at 80-100 years 59 .”

    From The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

    The ‘Life cycle forest, product & integrated processing energy carbon pools’ section describes wood in housing and similar buildings as long-lived carbon storage and estimates a useful life of 80 years for US housing. It also says newer housing may last more than 80 years, but it does not give a 100-year upper estimate or call the 80–100-year range conservative. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under certain highly specific circumstances, CO2 utilization in wood products occurs in addition to direct CO2 removal by forests; sustainable harvesting can maintain carbon stocks in forests while providing a source of renewable biomass.

    “The utilization of CO 2 in wood products will occur in addition to the direct removal of CO 2 by forests under certain highly specific circumstances; sustainable harvesting can maintain carbon stocks in forests while providing a source of renewable biomass 58,59 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [24]24. Lippke B, ComnickJ, Mason CL, Stokes B. Impacts of thinning Intensity and implementation schedules on fire, carbon storage and economics in woody biomass utilization: challenges and opportunities. Forest Product Journal Publication 7223, 47-59 (2008).
  2. [46]46. Carey A, Lippke B, Sessions J. Intentional ecosystem management: managing forests for biodiversity. J. Sust. Forestry Vol. 9(3-4), 83-125(1999).
  3. [65]65. Kasting JF. The Carbon Cycle, and the long-term effect of fossil fuel burning. US Global Change Research Office (1998). www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol4no1/ carbcycle.html 102 ISO14044. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment -Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization 2006. www.iso.org 103 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2003 & 2009. US LCI database project -Phase I Final Report (15 April 2009). www.nrel.gov.lci/ 108 Swedish Forest Agency. Rundvirkes- ochskogsbränslebalanserförår 2007 (Roundwood-and forest energy balances for 2007). Meddelande 4-2008. (in Swedish) (2008). www.svo.se/episerver4/dokument/sks/ aktuellt/press/2008/meddelande%20VB.pdf 109 US EPA www.epa.gov/nrml/std/sab/traci/ 110

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lippke, B., Oneil, E., Harrison, R., Skog, K., Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Forest Products Laboratory (US)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
Venue
Carbon Management
Published
2011-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
303-333
ISSN
  • 1758-3004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-3012
OpenAlex
W2153572903
Cited by
309
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 16
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Carbon Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Forest Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
Keywords
forest management, wood utilization, carbon mitigation, carbon pools, renewable fuels, sustainable forest management, life cycle emissions, forest carbon policy, unintended consequences of policy, wood products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review