Dynamic flow and shear stress as key parameters for intestinal cells morphology and polarization in an organ-on-a-chip model
Open accessAbstract
Gut-on-a-chip microfluidic devices have emerged as versatile and practical systems for modeling the human intestine in vitro . Cells cultured under microfluidic conditions experience the effect of shear stress, used as a biomechanical cue to promote a faster cell polarization in Caco-2 cells when compared with static culture conditions. However, published systems to date have utilized a constant flow rate that fails to account for changes in cell shear stress ( $${\tau }_{c}$$ τ c ) resulting from changes in cell elongation that occur with differentiation. In this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations predict that cells with villi-like morphology experience a $${\tau }_{c}$$ τ c higher than bulge-like cells at the initial growth stages. Therefore, we investigated the use of a dynamic flow rate to maintain a constant $${\tau }_{c}$$ τ c across the experiment. Microscopic assessment of cell morphology and dome formation confirmed the initiation of Caco-2 polarization within three days. Next, adopting our dynamic approach, we evaluated whether the following decreased flow could still contribute to complete cell differentiation if compared with the standard constant flow methodology. Caco-2 cells polarized under both conditions, secreted mucin-2 and villin and formed tight junctions and crypt-villi structures. Gene expression was not impacted using the dynamic flow rate. In conclusion, our dynamic flow approach still facilitates cell differentiation while enabling a reduced consumption of reagents.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kim, H. J., Huh, D., Hamilton, G., & Ingber, D. E. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40074j · Cited by 1,734 · see citing works
How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research?
Nguyen, T. L. A., Vieira-Silva, S., Liston, A., & Raes, J. (2015) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.017400 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
Gut-on-a-Chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation
Kim, H. J., & Ingber, D. E. (2013) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c3ib40126j · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Personalised organs-on-chips: functional testing for precision medicine
van den Berg, A., Mummery, C. L., Passier, R., & van der Meer, A. D. (2019) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00827b · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Microfluidic gut-on-a-chip with three-dimensional villi structure
Shim, K.-Y., Lee, D., Han, J., Nguyen, N.-T., Park, S., & Sung, J. H. (2017) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1007/s10544-017-0179-y · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fois, C. A. M., Schindeler, A., Valtchev, P., & Dehghani, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dehghani, Fariba
- Venue
- Biomedical Microdevices
- Published
- 2021-10-16
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 55-55
- ISSN
- 1387-2176 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8781
- PMC
- PMC8520520
- OpenAlex
- W3207800715
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biomedical Microdevices (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Institute NSW
- Australian Research Council (DP170102931)
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- gut-on-a-chip, Caco-2 cells, cell polarization, shear stress, intestinal differentiation, cell morphology, organ-on-a-chip, MUC2, villin, tight junctions, computational fluid dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Stress, Mechanical, Caco-2 Cells, Tight Junctions, Microfluidics, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review