Cited by 37BRCA gene mutations in cancerDNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Mutation analysis of BRIP1/BACH1 in BRCA1/BRCA2 negative Chinese women with early onset breast cancer or affected relatives

Cao, A-Yong, Huang, Juan, Hu, Zhen, Li, Wen-Feng, Ma, Zhong-Liang, Tang, Li-Li, Zhang, Bin, Su, Feng-Xi +10 more·2009·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

The proper interaction between BRIP1/BACH1 and BRCA1 protein has been found to be crucial for BRCA1-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and BRIP1/BACH1 mutations were estimated to confer a relative risk for breast cancer of 2.0 in western populations. In Chinese population, BRCA1 mutations could explain a relatively large proportion of inherited breast cancer cases in comparison with BRCA2 mutations, which probably deduced a hypothesis that those genes involved in BRCA1-mediated DNA repair pathway might play a more significant role in the etiology of Chinese breast cancer. To investigate the contribution of BRIP1/BACH1 mutations to the predisposition of Chinese non-BRCA1/BRCA2 hereditary breast cancer, we screened all the coding exons and adjacent intronic splice junction regions of BRIP1/BACH1 in 357 Chinese women with early-onset breast cancer or affected relatives from five different breast disease clinical centers in China, using PCR-DHPLC and DNA sequencing analysis. Some genetic variants identified in the cases were then studied in 864 normal controls with no personal or family history of breast cancer. We found no protein-truncated mutations in our population, while a novel recurrent non-synonymous variant, Q944E, was detected in two independent families in contrast with none in the controls, interestingly, this alteration occurs in the BRCA1 binding domain of the BACH1 protein. Then a further study performed on the two mutation positive families revealed the partial co-segregation of this mutation allele with cancer. The novel alteration Q944E identified in our study possibly represents a rare disease-related allele, nevertheless functional analysis is still warranted to resolve the ability of this altered BACH1 protein to bind BRCA1. Altogether, the results of our study indicated that germline mutations in BRIP1/BACH were extremely rare in Chinese population and there was no evidence for the recommendation of BRIP1/BACH1 for genetic testing in Chinese.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-008-0052-z

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tumor suppression likely requires both the helicase domain and nuclear co-localization with BRCA1, because variants in the nuclear localization sequence (A173C) or BRCA1-binding domain were detected in patients with a strong family history of breast cancer.

    “Tumor suppression likely requires not only the helicase domain, but also nuclear co-localization with BRCA1, given that variants with a sequence change in the nuclear localization sequence (A173C) [60] or BRCA1-binding domain were detected in patients with a strong family history of breast cancer [43,53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, A.-Y., Huang, J., Hu, Z., Li, W.-F., Ma, Z.-L., Tang, L.-L., Zhang, B., Su, F.-X., Zhou, J., Di, G.-H., Shen, K.-W., Wu, J., Lu, J.-S., Luo, J.-M., Yuan, W.-T., Shen, Z.-Z., Huang, W., & Shao, Z.-M.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN)
  • Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CN)
Corresponding author
Shao, Zhi-Ming
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2008-05-16
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
51-55
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W1981123531
Cited by
37
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Fudan University
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
BRIP1, BACH1, BRCA1, BRCA2, hereditary breast cancer, early-onset breast cancer, germline mutations, DNA double-strand break repair, Chinese women, genetic testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, China, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA-Binding Proteins, Exons, Family Health, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Germ-Line Mutation, Genes, BRCA1, RNA Helicases, Genes, BRCA2, Basic-Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review