Cited by 117Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesCancer survivorship and careMedical Research and Treatments

Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the Pathways Study

Open access
Greenlee, Heather, Kwan, Marilyn L., Ergas, Isaac Joshua, Sherman, Karen J., Krathwohl, Sarah E., Bonnell, Christine, Lee, Marion M., Kushi, Lawrence H.·2009·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Many women use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to maintain or improve their health. We describe CAM use among the first 1,000 participants enrolled in the Pathways Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). Participants, identified by rapid case ascertainment in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, are women > or = 21 years diagnosed with first invasive BC. Comprehensive baseline data are collected on CAM use through in-person interviews. Study participants include 70.9% non-Hispanic whites, 10.2% Hispanics, 9.0% Asians, 6.5% African-Americans, and 3.4% others. Most women (82.2%) were diagnosed with AJCC stage I/II BC at average (+/-SD) age 59.5 (+/-12.0) years and reported prior use of at least one form of CAM (96.5% of participants). In the 5 years before diagnosis, CAM therapies used at least weekly by >20% of women included green tea, glucosamine, omega-3 fatty acids, prayer and religion. CAM use was high (86.1% of participants) in the period immediately following diagnosis; 47.5% used botanical supplements, 47.2% used other natural products, 28.8% used special diets, 64.2% used mind-body healing, and 26.5% used body/energy/other treatments. In multivariable analyses, frequent use of each CAM modality before and after diagnosis was associated with use of other CAM modalities and other health behaviors (i.e., high fruit/vegetable intake, lower BMI). CAM use before and after BC diagnosis is common in this diverse group of women. Our results emphasize the need for clinicians to discuss CAM use with all BC patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-009-0315-3

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals affected by cancer are increasingly turning to complementary and integrative medicine, including mindfulness practices.

    “To help cope with the distress associated with the diagnosis, disease symptoms, and treatment, individuals affected by cancer are increasingly turning to complementary and integrative medicine [27–30], including mindfulness practices.”

    From Being present: A single-arm feasibility study of audio-based mindfulness meditation for colorectal cancer patients and caregivers (2018) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages not specified in our copy) say complementary and alternative medicine use has increased among women with breast cancer. The Results identify meditation and other mind-body practices, but the paper does not establish the same trend for people affected by cancer generally or show that coping with distress motivates their use. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenlee, H., Kwan, M. L., Ergas, I. J., Sherman, K. J., Krathwohl, S. E., Bonnell, C., Lee, M. M., & Kushi, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Greenlee, Heather
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2009-01-31
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
653-665
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2043402160
Cited by
117
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
FWCI
29.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r25ca094061-11)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA094061, R25-CA 094061, R01CA105274, CA105274, CA094061)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
complementary and alternative medicine, breast cancer, herbal supplements, mind-body healing, green tea, glucosamine, omega-3 fatty acids, special diets, health behavior, fruit and vegetable intake, body mass index, Pathways Study, Kaiser Permanente
MeSH terms
Aged, Complementary Therapies, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review