The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast cancer oral anti-cancer medication adherence: a systematic review of psychosocial motivators and barriers
Abstract
Purpose In the past decade, there has been an increase in the development and use of oral anti-cancer medications (OAMs), especially for breast cancer-the most prevalent cancer in women. However, adherence rates for OAMs are often suboptimal, leading to lower survival rate, increased risk of recurrence, and higher healthcare costs. Our goal was to identify potentially modifiable psychosocial facilitators and barriers that may be targeted to increase OAM adherence for breast cancer patients.Methods We systematically searched PubMed for studies published in the U.S. by June 15, 2016 that addressed the following: (1) OAMs for breast cancer; (2) medication adherence; and (3) at least one psychosocial aspect of adherence.Results Of the 1752 papers screened, 21 articles were included and analyzed. The most commonly reported motivators for adherence are patient-provider relationships (n = 11 studied, 82% reported significant association) and positive views and beliefs of medication (n = 9 studied, 89% reported significant association). We also identified consistent evidence of the impact of depression and emotions, perception of illness, concern of side effects, self-efficacy in medication management and decision making, knowledge of medication, and social support on OAM adherence.Conclusions Compared to traditional demographic, system, and clinical-related factors that have been well documented in the literature but are not easily changed, these cognitive, psychological, and interpersonal factors are more amendable via intervention and therefore could generate greater benefit in improving patient compliance and health outcomes. As OAMs shift treatment administration responsibility onto patients, continuous provider communication and education on illness and regimen are the keys to supporting patients' medication behavior.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These factors can have negative consequences for the disease course, including an increase in the frequency and duration of hospital stays, lower adherence to treatment recommendations, difficulties in coping with the disease, reduced quality of life and an increase in mortality [9–14].”
Citations
Cites
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications
Vrijens, B., De Geest, S., Hughes, D. A., Przemyslaw, K., Demonceau, J., Ruppar, T., Dobbels, F., Fargher, E., Morrison, V., Lewek, P., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04167.x · Cited by 2,028
Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.
Liu, G., Franssen, E., Fitch, M. I., & Warner, E. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.1.110 · Cited by 917
Hershman, D. L., Shao, T., Kushi, L. H., Buono, D., Tsai, W. Y., Fehrenbacher, L., Kwan, M., Gomez, S. L., & Neugut, A. I. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1132-4 · Cited by 870
Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use
Stirratt, M. J., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Crane, H. M., Simoni, J. M., Czajkowski, S., Hilliard, M. E., Aikens, J. E., Hunter, C. M., Velligan, D. I., Huntley, K., et al. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0315-2 · Cited by 824
Viswanathan, M., Golin, C. E., Jones, C. D., Ashok, M., Blalock, S. J., Wines, R. C. M., Coker-Schwimmer, E. J. L., Rosen, D. L., Sista, P., & Lohr, K. N. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00538 · Cited by 754
Murphy, C. C., Bartholomew, L. K., Carpentier, M. Y., Bluethmann, S. M., & Vernon, S. W. (2012) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2114-5 · Cited by 708
Adherence to Therapy With Oral Antineoplastic Agents
Partridge, A. H. (2002) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.9.652 · Cited by 585
Patient adherence and persistence with oral anticancer treatment
Ruddy, K., Mayer, E., & Partridge, A. (2009) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20004 · Cited by 569
NCCN Task Force Report: Oral Chemotherapy
Weingart, S. N., Brown, E., Bach, P. B., Eng, K. J., Johnson, S. A., Kuzel, T. M., Langbaum, T. S., Leedy, R. D., Muller, R. J., Newcomer, L. N., et al. (2008) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2008.2003 · Cited by 438
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Riba, M. B., Donovan, K. A., Andersen, B., Braun, I., Breitbart, W. S., Brewer, B. W., Buchmann, L. O., Clark, M. M., Collins, M., Corbett, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048 · Cited by 871
Molecular mechanisms linking exercise to cancer prevention and treatment
Hojman, P., Gehl, J., Christensen, J. F., & Pedersen, B. K. (2018) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.015 · Cited by 600
Soundararajan, P., & Kim, J. S. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23112983 · Cited by 278
The relationship between acceptance of cancer and distress: A meta-analytic review
Secinti, E., Tometich, D. B., Johns, S. A., & Mosher, C. E. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.05.001 · Cited by 132
“and associations with important health outcomes (L. F. Brown et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2017; Pinquart & Duberstein, 2010).”
BackgroundEbrahiminejad, V., Prewett, P. D., Davies, G. J., & Rad, Z. F. (2022) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.202101856 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, C., Clark, R., Tu, P., Bosworth, H. B., & Zullig, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Cheryl
- Venue
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Published
- 2017-06-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-260
- ISSN
- 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7217
- OpenAlex
- W2621337730
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- VA Research Career Scientist Award (RCS 08-027)
- VA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Career Development Award (CDA 13-025)
- Duke University Bass Connections
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- breast cancer, medication adherence, psychosocial factors, patient-provider relationship, medication beliefs, depression, adverse effects, self-efficacy, social support, patient education, treatment adherence interventions
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review