Cited by 246Ethics in Business and EducationPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in medical practice

The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: An exploratory investigation

Mencl, Jennifer, May, Douglas R.·2009·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-008-9765-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals' empathic responses are modulated by the physical distance with others.

    “Notably, individuals' empathic responses are modulated by the physical distance with others (Lomoriello, Meconi, Rinaldi, & Sessa, 2018;Mahayana et al., 2014;Mencl & May, 2009).”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Mencl & May, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mencl, J., & May, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Mencl, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2008-05-08
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
201-226
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W1992148485
Cited by
246
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
ethical decision-making, proximity, empathy, physical proximity, social proximity, psychological closeness, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, moral intention, carpal tunnel syndrome, HR professionals, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review