Cited by 247Ethics in Business and EducationEthics in medical practicePsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Research Note and Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: Boundary Conditions and Extensions

Lehnert, Kevin, Park, Yung-hwal, Singh, Nitish·2015·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-014-2147-2

Cites

177 of 177 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 178 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N.
Affiliations
  • Grand Valley State University (US)
  • Truman State University (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Lehnert, Kevin
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2014-03-29
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
195-219
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2073259619
Cited by
247
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
ethical decision-making, business ethics, moral consciousness, moral behavior, moral judgment, moral intention, moderating effect, mediating effect, boundary conditions, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review