Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite e-procurement technology being mandated in many organisations, individual acceptance and compliance is often extremely hard to force.
“Despite the fact that e-procurement technology is now mandated in many organisations, individual acceptance and compliance is often extremely hard to force, with dissatisfied users typically finding ways to circumvent mandated procurement processes (Brandon-Jones, 2017; Karjalainen et al. 2009; Kauppi and van Raaij, 2015; Pearcy and Giunipero, 2008; Reunis et al. 2006).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Karjalainen et al. 2009
Dissatisfied users of mandated e-procurement typically find ways to circumvent mandated procurement processes.
“Despite the fact that e-procurement technology is now mandated in many organisations, individual acceptance and compliance is often extremely hard to force, with dissatisfied users typically finding ways to circumvent mandated procurement processes (Brandon-Jones, 2017; Karjalainen et al. 2009; Kauppi and van Raaij, 2015; Pearcy and Giunipero, 2008; Reunis et al. 2006).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Karjalainen et al. 2009
Cites
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.015 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Key issues in e-procurement: Procurement implementation and operation in the public sector
Croom, S. R., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2005) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-05-03-2005-b004 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
The impact of user‐perceived e‐procurement quality on system and contract compliance
Brandon‐Jones, A., & Carey, S. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111111928 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Ensuring corporate travel compliance – Control vs. commitment strategies
Holma, A.-M., Bask, A., & Kauppi, K. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.04.008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karjalainen, K., Kemppainen, K., & van Raaij, E. M.
- Corresponding author
- Karjalainen, Katri
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2008-05-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-261
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2057448061
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Keywords
- framework agreements, supplier contracts, procurement policy, sabotage, procurement professionals, conceptual framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
