Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Competition and innovation can function as the driving force behind planned obsolescence.
“competition and innovation can also function as the driving force behind planned obsolescence (Guiltinan, 2009)”
From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Guiltinan, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 312
- Authors
- Guiltinan, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guiltinan, Joseph
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2008-08-26
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 19-28
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2035369995
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- planned obsolescence, environmental ethics, durable goods, sustainable product development, corporate environmental responsibility, state environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
