Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organisations take up positions on sustainability due to normative or other external pressures.
“On this view, organisations take up positions on sustainability due to normative or other external pressures (Matten & Moon 2008; Yang & Rivers 2009 )”
From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Yang & Rivers 2009
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
STRATEGY IN EMERGING ECONOMIES.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556394 · Cited by 3,835 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research
Witt, M. A. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific
Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1400 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective
Grob, S., & Benn, S. (2014) · Australasian Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1080/14486563.2013.878259 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, X., & Rivers, C.
- Affiliations
- University of San Francisco (US)
- University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Xiaohua
- Rivers, Cheryl
- ORCID
- Yang, Xiaohua
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- 155-169
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1979180565
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- corporate social responsibility, multinational corporations, subsidiaries, stakeholder theory, institutional theory, legitimacy, local adaptation, spillover effects, parent-subsidiary relationships, annexation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
