Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh

Belal, Ataur R., Roberts, Robin W.·2010·Journal of Business Ethics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-010-0511-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Adams, C.: 2002, ‘Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2), 223-250. · DOI
  2. Al-khater, K., & Naser, K.: 2003, ‘Users’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility and accountability: evidence from an emerging economy’, Managerial Auditing Journal 18(6/7), 538-548. · DOI
  3. Bebbington, J., R. Gray, I. Thomson, and D. Walters: 1994, ‘Accountants’ Attitudes and Environmentally-sensitive Accounting’, Accounting and Business Research 24(Spring), 109–120. · DOI
  4. Bebbington, J., Gray, R., & Owen, D.: 1999, ‘Seeing the wood for the trees: taking the pulse of social and environmental accounting’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 12(1), 47-51. · DOI
  5. Belal, A.: 2000, ‘Environmental Reporting in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh’, Eco-Management and Auditing 7(3), 114-121. · DOI
  6. Belal, A.: 2001, ‘A Study of Corporate Social Disclosures in Bangladesh’, Managerial Auditing Journal 16(5), 274-289. · DOI
  7. Belal, A. R.: 2002, ‘Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms’ social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR)’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(1), 8-25. · DOI
  8. Belal, A. R.: 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Developing Countries: The Case of Bangladesh, (Ashgate, Aldershot).
  9. Belal, A. R., Khan, N. A., & Alam, S. A.: 1998, ‘Industrial Pollution and the Environment in Bangladesh: An Overview’, Asian Journal of Environmental Management 6(2), 115-124.
  10. Belal, A. R., & Owen, D.: 2007, ‘The Views of Corporate Managers on the Current State of, and Future Prospects for, Social Reporting in Bangladesh: An Engagement Based Study’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20(3), 472-494. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Bird, F., & Smucker, J.: 2007, ‘The Social Responsibilities of International Business Firms in Developing Areas’, Journal of Business Ethics 73(1), 1-9. · DOI
  12. Brown, N., & Deegan, C.: 1999, ‘The public disclosure of environmental performance information - a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory’, Accounting and Business Research 29(1), 21-41. · DOI
  13. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B.: 2005, ‘Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 58(1), 137-148. · DOI
  14. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., & Nahapiet, J.: 1980, ‘The roles of accounting in organizations and society’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(1), 5-27. · DOI
  15. Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C.: 2006, ‘Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 31(4-5), 343-372. · DOI
  16. Deegan, C., Geddes, S., & Staunton, J.: 1995, ‘A Survey of Australian Accountants’ Attitudes on Environmental Reporting’, Accounting Forum 19(2/3), 143-163.
  17. Deegan, C., & Unerman, J.: 2006, Financial Accounting Theory, (McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, UK).
  18. EC. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. Brussels: European Commission (EC).
  19. Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S.: 2001, ‘Socially Responsible Investment and Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting in the UK: An Exploratory Study’, The British Accounting Review 33(4), 523-548. · DOI
  20. Godfrey, P. C., & Hatch, N. W.: 2007, ‘Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century’, Journal of Business Ethics 70(1), 87-98. · DOI
  21. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R., & Zadek, S.: 1997, ‘Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(3), 325-364. · DOI
  22. Holder-Webb L., Cohen J., Nath L.,Wood, D (2009) The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among US firms. Journal of Business Ethics 84:497-527. · DOI
  23. Imam, S.: 1999, ‘Environmental Reporting in Bangladesh’, Social and Environmental Accounting 19(2), 12-14. · DOI
  24. Imam, S.: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Performance Reporting in Bangladesh’, Managerial Auditing Journal 15(3), 133-141. · DOI
  25. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C.: 2008, ‘Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21(6), 850 - 874. · DOI
  26. Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R.: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSREP): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(3), 243-262. · DOI
  27. Kaler, J.: 2006, ‘Evaluating Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 69(3), 249-268. · DOI
  28. Khundhker, N.: 2002, ‘Globalisation, Competitiveness and Job Quality in the Garment Industry in Bangladesh’, in M. Muqtada, A. Singh, and M. Rashid (eds.), Bangladesh: Economic and Social Challenges of Globalisation (University Press Ltd., Dhaka).
  29. Kuasirikun, N.: 2005, ‘Attitudes to the development and implementation of social and environmental accounting in Thailand’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(8), 1035-1057. · DOI
  30. Larrinaga, C., Llena, F., Moneva, J. M., Carrasco, F., & Correa, C.: 2002, ‘Accountability and accounting regulation: The case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard’, European Accounting Review 11(4), 723-740. · DOI
  31. Lodhia, S. K.: 2003, ‘Accountants’ response to the environmental agenda in a developing nation: an initial and exploratory study on Fiji’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 14(7), 715-737. · DOI
  32. Mahmud, W.: 2004, ‘Bangladesh: Structural Adjustment and Beyond’, in W. Mahmud (ed.), Adjustment and Beyond: the Reform Experience in South Asia (Palgrave, Basingstoke).
  33. Medawar, C.: 1976, ‘The Social Audit: A Political View’, Accounting, Organisations and Society 1(4), 389-394. · DOI
  34. Naser, K., & Baker, N.: 1999, ‘Empirical Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Accountability in Developing Countries: The Case of Jordan’, Advances in International Accounting 12, 193-226.
  35. Newson, M., & Deegan, C.: 2002, ‘Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea’, The International Journal of Accounting 37(2), 183-213. · DOI
  36. O’Dwyer, B.: 2002, ‘Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(3), 406-436. · DOI
  37. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Bradley, J.: 2005a, ‘Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(1), 14-43. · DOI
  38. O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E.: 2005b, ‘User needs in sustainability reporting: perspective of stakeholders in Ireland’, European Accounting Review 14(4), 759-787. · DOI
  39. Owen D., Gray R., Bebbington J (1997) ‘Green Accounting: Cosmetic Irrelevance or Radical Agenda for Change?’. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting 4(2):175-198. · DOI
  40. Owen D. L., Swift T. A., Humphrey C., Bowerman M (2000) ‘The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?’. European Accounting Review 9(1):81-90. · DOI
  41. Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K.: 2001, ‘Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting’, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264-282. · DOI
  42. Parkinson, J.: 2003, ‘Disclosure and corporate social and environmental performance: competitiveness and enterprise in a broader social frame’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 3(1), 3-39. · DOI
  43. Pater, A., & Lierop, K. v.: 2006, ‘Sense and sensitivity: the roles of organisation and stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 339-351. · DOI
  44. Perry, M., & Singh, S. (2001). Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Singapore and Malaysia: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives (No. PP TBS 3). Geneva: UNRISD.
  45. Quaak, L., Aalbers, T., & Goedee, J.: 2007, ‘Transparency of Corporate Social Responsibility in Dutch Breweries’, Journal of Business Ethics 76(3), 293-308. · DOI
  46. Reed, D.: 2002, ‘Employing Normative Stakeholder Theory in Developing Countries: A Critical Theory Perspective’, Business & Society 41(2), 166-207. · DOI
  47. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K.: 2008, ‘Moral Discourse and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting’, Journal of Business Ethics 78(1), 47-64. · DOI
  48. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. 2003. Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 243–256. · DOI
  49. Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. 2003. Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48: 175–187. · DOI
  50. Sobhani, F. A., Amran, A., & Zainuddin, Y.: 2009, ‘Revisiting the practices of corporate social and environmental disclosure in Bangladesh’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(3), 167-183. · DOI
  51. Tilt, C. A.: 1994, ‘The Influence of External Pressure Groups on Corporate Social Disclosure: Some Empirical Evidence’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7(4), 47-72. · DOI
  52. Tsoi, J.: 2010, ‘Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Future Scenarios to Improve Corporate Social Responsibility in Hong Kong and Mainland China ‘, Journal of Business Ethics 91(3), 391 - 404. · DOI
  53. Unerman, J., & Bennett, M.: 2004, ‘Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(7), 685-707. · DOI
  54. Vogel, D.: 2010, ‘The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct: Achievements and Limitations’, Business and Society 49(1), 68–87. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Belal, A. R., & Roberts, R. W.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2010-06-02
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
311-324
ISSN
  • 0167-4544
  • 1573-0697
Cited by
115
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-010-0511-4
The paper
Belal, A. R., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0511-4