The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 3×
“First, from a research perspective, the analysis highlights, that the purely profit-focused view on corporate social responsibility as recommended by Friedman (1970) does not reflect the current corporate practice as we do not find indication that profit-seeking is the core rationale in…”
BackgroundMethodDiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Capitalism and Freedom: Fortieth Anniversary Edition
Friedman, M. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226264189.001.0001 · Cited by 8,225
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Social determinants of health inequalities
Marmot, M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71146-6 · Cited by 5,086
A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.
RUSSO, M. V., & FOUTS, P. A. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257052 · Cited by 4,805
Cited by
The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 · Cited by 1,537
Business cases for sustainability: a stakeholder theory perspective
Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026617722882 · Cited by 477
Self-citationDasGupta, R. (2022) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487 · Cited by 404
Neumann, H. L., Martinez, L. M., & Martinez, L. F. (2021) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-11-2019-0405 · Cited by 134
Greenwashing and Bluewashing in Black Friday-Related Sustainable Fashion Marketing on Instagram
Sailer, A., Wilfing, H., & Straus, E. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031494 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2015-10-08
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-276
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W1920087588
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3
- The paper
- Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J. (2017). In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking? Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
