Cited by 196Consumer Market Behavior and PricingEthics in Business and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Mapping the Ethicality of Algorithmic Pricing: A Review of Dynamic and Personalized Pricing

Open access
Seele, Peter, Dierksmeier, Claus, Hofstetter, Reto, Schultz, Mario D.·2021·Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract

Firms increasingly deploy algorithmic pricing approaches to determine what to charge for their goods and services. Algorithmic pricing can discriminate prices both dynamically over time and personally depending on individual consumer information. Although legal, the ethicality of such approaches needs to be examined as often they trigger moral concerns and sometimes outrage. In this research paper, we provide an overview and discussion of the ethical challenges germane to algorithmic pricing. As a basis for our discussion, we perform a systematic interpretative review of 315 related articles on dynamic and personalized pricing as well as pricing algorithms in general. We then use this review to define the term algorithmic pricing and map its key elements at the micro-, meso-, and macro levels from a business and marketing ethics perspective. Thus, we can identify morally ambivalent topics that call for deeper exploration by future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-019-04371-w

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 174 · Cited by 196

Authors
Seele, P., Dierksmeier, C., Hofstetter, R., & Schultz, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Lucerne (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Seele, Peter
  • Dierksmeier, Claus
  • Hofstetter, Reto
  • Schultz, Mario D.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2019-12-10
Volume
170
Issue
4
Pages
697-719
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W2994933920
Cited by
196
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
19.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
algorithmic pricing, dynamic pricing, personalized pricing, business ethics, marketing ethics, ethical considerations, consumer privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review