Cited by 29Cancer survivorship and careGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Comprehensive cancer control: promoting survivor health and wellness

Open access
Rohan, Elizabeth A., Miller, Nina, Bonner, Floyd, Fultz-Butts, Kristi, Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L., Alfano, Catherine M., Santiago, Kristen Cox, Bergman, Kendall +1 more·2018·Cancer Causes & Control

Abstract

Purpose As of 2016, an estimated 15.5 million cancer survivors were living in the United States and the number of cancer survivors is expected to increase to 20.3 million by 2026. Numerous clinical studies have shown that comorbidities, such as obesity and diabetes, and unhealthy lifestyle choices, such as physical inactivity and heavy smoking, negatively influence overall quality of life and long-term survival of cancer survivors. Accordingly, survivorship programs seek to focus on overall wellness, including symptom management, monitoring for late effects of treatment, monitoring for recurrence, helping patients adapt healthy behaviors, and quality of life. This paper provides a broad overview of public health efforts to address the needs of cancer survivors.Methods To describe a range of examples of survivorship initiatives in comprehensive cancer control, we analyzed documents from comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions and solicited detailed examples from several national partners.Results Comprehensive cancer control programs, coalitions, and partners are undertaking myriad initiatives to address cancer survivorship and building upon evidence-based interventions to promote healthy behaviors for cancer survivors across the country.Conclusion A coordinated public health approach to caring for the growing population of cancer survivors can help address the long-term physical, psychosocial, and economic effects of cancer treatment on cancer survivors and their families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10552-018-1107-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation challenges for comprehensive survivorship care include lack of health care professional awareness and training, prioritization of survivorship, organizational barriers such as dedicated time slots, multidisciplinary assessment, referral networks, and reimbursement issues.

    “This may be related to implementation challenges such as lack of health care professional awareness and training and prioritization of survivorship, organizational barriers including the need for dedicated time slots in clinics to allow for multidisciplinary assessment and management involving a range of subspecialty professionals and supportive care experts, articulation with appropriate referral”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 29

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Institute of Medicine (2012) The role of obesity in cancer in cancer survival and recurrence. In: Workshop summary. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 24830056
  2. [53]National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) Long-term survivorship care after cancer treatment: proceedings of a workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 29738209

Authors
Rohan, E. A., Miller, N., Bonner, F., Fultz-Butts, K., Pratt-Chapman, M. L., Alfano, C. M., Santiago, K. C., Bergman, K., & Tai, E.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • American College of Surgeons (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Cancer Support Community (US)
Corresponding author
Rohan, Elizabeth A.
Venue
Cancer Causes & Control
Published
2018-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1277-1285
ISSN
  • 0957-5243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7225
OpenAlex
W2903461226
Cited by
29
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Causes & Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Funding Source for the National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center: #5U55DP003054)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer survivors, comprehensive cancer control, survivorship programs, public health interventions, health behavior, quality of life, late effects of cancer treatment, recurrence monitoring, economic burden of cancer, obesity, diabetes mellitus, physical inactivity, smoking
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Life Style, Neoplasms, Obesity, Public Health, Quality of Life, United States, Health Behavior, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review