Cited by 37Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoffee research and impactsCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Effect of caffeine on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging during regadenoson pharmacologic stress: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Open access
Tejani, Furqan H., Thompson, Randall C., Kristy, Rita, Bukofzer, Stan·2014·The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized study was conducted to assess the effect of caffeine on regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Subjects with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease underwent a rest single-photon emission computed tomography MPI on day 1 (MPI-1) and a stress MPI with regadenoson on day 3 (MPI-2). Individuals with ≥1 segment with a reversible defect received double-blind caffeine tablets (200 or 400 mg) or placebo 90 min before a repeat regadenoson stress MPI (MPI-3) on day 5. Overall, 207 subjects completed the study (caffeine 200 mg, n = 70; caffeine 400 mg, n = 71; placebo, n = 66). The mean number of segments with reversible defects decreased from MPI-2 to MPI-3 in the caffeine 200 and 400 mg groups versus no significant change in the placebo group [mean ± standard deviation: -0.61 ± 1.097, -0.62 ± 1.367, and 0.12 ± 0.981, respectively (overall treatment effect, P < 0.001)]. The majority of subjects who received caffeine shifted to a lower ischemia size category from MPI-2 to MPI-3, with no clear pattern observed in subjects who received placebo. For caffeine exposed patients with ≥3 segments with reversible defects at MPI-2, 21/23 had fewer detected at MPI-3. Both the 200 and 400 mg doses of caffeine significantly reduced the number of segments with reversible defects detected by regadenoson stress MPI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10554-014-0419-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tejani et al. 2014 showed that doses of caffeine of 200 mg and 400 mg significantly decreased the number of cardiac segments with reversible vascularisation defects, suggesting that caffeine at doses of 200 mg or greater could significantly counteract the vasodilator effect of regadenoson in the coronary arteries in patients with coronary artery disease.

    “a similar study using regadenoson stress-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in patients with CAD showed that doses of caffeine of 200 mg and 400 mg significantly decreased the number of cardiac segments with reversible vascularisation defects, suggesting that caffeine at doses of 200 mg or greater could significantly counteract the vasodilator effect of regadenoson in the”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Tejani et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tejani, F. H., Thompson, R. C., Kristy, R., & Bukofzer, S.
Affiliations
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
  • Astellas Pharma (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Tejani, Furqan H.
Venue
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
979-989
ISSN
  • 0167-9899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-5794
  • 1573-0743
OpenAlex
W1964070671
Cited by
37
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International journal of cardiac imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  • Astellas Pharma Global Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
caffeine, regadenoson, myocardial perfusion imaging, SPECT, pharmacological stress, coronary artery disease, reversible myocardial ischemia, coronary artery disease severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Caffeine, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Purines, Pyrazoles, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Adenosine A2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review