CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 282Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pediatric Feeding Disorders: A Quantitative Synthesis of Treatment Outcomes

Sharp, William G., Jaquess, David L., Morton, Jane F., Herzinger, Caitlin V.·2010·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
DOI 10.1007/s10567-010-0079-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A systematic review of the literature regarding treatment of pediatric feeding disorders was conducted. Articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals (1970-2010) evaluating treatment of severe food refusal or selectivity were identified. Studies demonstrating strict experimental control were selected and analyzed. Forty-eight single-case research studies reporting outcomes for 96 participants were included in the review. Most children presented with complex medical and developmental concerns and were treated at multidisciplinary feeding disorders programs. All studies involved behavioral intervention; no well-controlled studies evaluating feeding interventions by other theoretical perspectives or clinical disciplines met inclusion criteria. Results indicated that behavioral intervention was associated with significant improvements in feeding behavior. Clinical and research implications are discussed, including movement toward the identification of key behavioral antecedents and consequences that promote appropriate mealtime performance, as well as the need to better document outcomes beyond behavioral improvements, such as changes in anthropometric parameters, generalization of treatment gains to caregivers, and improvements in nutritional status.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-010-0079-7

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 123 references

7 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sharp, W. G., Jaquess, D. L., Morton, J. F., & Herzinger, C. V.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, William G.
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-09-16
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
348-365
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
DOI
10.1007/s10567-010-0079-7
OpenAlex
W1963483800
Cited by
282
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
pediatric feeding disorders, food refusal, picky eating, behavioral interventions, treatment outcomes, single subject research, antecedents and consequences, nutritional status, anthropometric outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Failure to Thrive, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Feeding and Eating Disorders of Childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review