Cited by 102Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Intensive, Manual‐based Intervention for Pediatric Feeding Disorders: Results From a Randomized Pilot Trial

Sharp, William G., Stubbs, Kathryn H., Adams, Heyward, Wells, Brian M., Lesack, Roseanne S., Criado, Kristen K., Simon, Elizabeth L., McCracken, Courtney E. +2 more·2016·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an intensive, manual‐based behavioral feeding intervention for children with chronic food refusal and dependence on enteral feeding or oral nutritional formula supplementation. Methods: Twenty children ages 13 to 72 months (12 boys and 8 girls) meeting criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder were randomly assigned to receive treatment for 5 consecutive days in a day treatment program (n = 10) or waitlist (n = 10). A team of trained therapists implemented treatment under the guidance of a multidisciplinary team. Parent training was delivered to support generalization of treatment gains. We tracked parental attrition and attendance, as well as therapist fidelity. Primary outcome measures were bite acceptance, disruptions, and grams consumed during meals. Results: Caregivers reported high satisfaction and acceptability of the intervention. Three participants (1 intervention; 2 waitlist) dropped out of the study before endpoint. Of the expected 140 treatment meals for the intervention group, 137 (97.8%) were actually attended. The intervention group showed significantly greater improvements (P < 0.05) on all primary outcome measures (d = 1.03–2.11) compared with waitlist (d = −1.13–0.24). A 1‐month follow‐up suggested stability in treatment gains. Conclusions: Results from this pilot study corroborate evidence from single‐subject and nonrandomized studies on the positive effects of behavioral intervention. Findings support the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of this manual‐based approach to intervention. These results warrant a large‐scale randomized trial to test the safety and efficacy of this intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001043

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, W. G., Stubbs, K. H., Adams, H., Wells, B. M., Lesack, R. S., Criado, K. K., Simon, E. L., McCracken, C. E., West, L. L., & Scahill, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Marcus Autism Center Atlanta GA
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, William G.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
658-663
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2323571464
Cited by
102
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
pediatric feeding disorders, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, food refusal, meal ingestion, parent training, intervention fidelity, feasibility
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Behavior Therapy, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Food Preferences, Georgia, Humans, Infant, Male, Manuals as Topic, Parents, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Care Team, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Feeding and Eating Disorders of Childhood, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review