The DOI matches its Crossref record; 162 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Adolescent Cognitive–Behavioral Sleep Interventions
Open accessAbstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of adolescent cognitive-behavioral sleep interventions. Searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were performed from inception to May 1, 2016, supplemented with manual screening. Nine trials were selected (n = 357, mean age = 14.97 years; female = 61.74%). Main outcomes were subjective (sleep diary/questionnaire) and objective (actigraphy) total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO). There were a small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n = 4) and a high risk of bias across the RCTs; therefore, within sleep condition meta-analyses were examined (n = 221). At post-intervention, subjective TST improved by 29.47 min (95% CI 17.18, 41.75), SOL by 21.44 min (95% CI -30.78, -12.11), SE by 5.34% (95% CI 2.64, 8.04), and WASO by a medium effect size [d = 0.59 (95% CI 0.36, 0.82)]. Objective SOL improved by 16.15 min (95% CI -26.13, -6.17) and SE by 2.82% (95% CI 0.58, 5.07). Global sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, depression, and anxiety also improved. Gains were generally maintained over time. Preliminary evidence suggests that adolescent cognitive-behavioral sleep interventions are effective, but further high-quality RCTs are needed. Suggestions for further research are provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“as some research has indicated behavioural components of CBT-I are more effective than cognitive components (Blake et al., 2017)”
From Do non-pharmacological sleep interventions affect anxiety symptoms? A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Blake et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · cited 1×
“Additionally, all trials were assessed for publication bias using funnel plots and the Egger test (Egger et al. 1997; Higgins et al. 2003).”
MethodPRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223 · cited 2×
“A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al. 2015).”
MethodConducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464 · cited 1×
“9.8 (Viechtbauer 2010), inR software v 3.3.1 (RCore Team2015).”
InfluentialDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617 · Cited by 12,052 · cited 1×
“Because comorbidity is the norm (Kessler et al. 2005, 2007), clinicians are often faced with the dilemma of which disorder/ disorders to prioritize for treatment.”
BackgroundMoher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883 · cited 1×
“Empirical evidence shows that lack of reporting of blinding is associated with biased estimates of treatment effect and more positive outcomes (Boutron et al. 2008; Higgins and Green 2011; Moher et al. 2012).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- American Medical Association. (2010). Resolution 503: Insufficient sleep in adolescents. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
- Murtagh, D., & Greenwood, K. (1995). Identifying effective psychological treatments for insomnia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 78–89. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blake, M. J., Trinder, J. A., & Allen, N. B. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.006 · Cited by 477
Self-citationSystematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of chatbots on lifestyle behaviours
Singh, B., Olds, T., Brinsley, J., Dumuid, D., Virgara, R., Matricciani, L., Watson, A., Szeto, K., Eglitis, E., Miatke, A., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00856-1 · Cited by 224
Childhood sleep: physical, cognitive, and behavioral consequences and implications
Liu, J.-H., Ji, X., Pitt, S., Wang, G.-H., Rovit, E., Lipman, T., & Jiang, F. (2022) · World Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s12519-022-00647-w · Cited by 176
“CBT-I modifies the patterns of thinking and behavior underlying sleep disturbances, such as poor sleep hygiene, irregular sleep–wake schedules, delayed bedtimes, pre-sleep hyperarousal, and maladaptive sleep-related cognitions [122].”
Becker, S. P., Epstein, J. N., Tamm, L., Tilford, A., Tischner, C. M., Isaacson, P. A., Simon, J. O., & Beebe, D. W. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.09.439 · Cited by 140
Sleep Disturbances and Atopic Dermatitis: Relationships, Methods for Assessment, and Therapies
Bawany, F., Northcott, C. A., Beck, L. A., & Pigeon, W. R. (2020) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.007 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, M. J., Sheeber, L. B., Youssef, G. J., Raniti, M. B., & Allen, N. B.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Oregon Research Institute (US)
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, Nicholas B.
- Venue
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
- Published
- 2017-03-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-249
- ISSN
- 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2827
- OpenAlex
- W2603508099
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- adolescents, sleep disorders, total sleep time, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, depression, anxiety, maintenance therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Sleep Wake Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
