Cited by 24Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Multicomponent Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention to Improve Sleep in Adolescents: A Multiple Baseline Design

Hendricks, Melissa C., Ward, Cynthia M., Grodin, Lauren K., Slifer, Keith J.·2014·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: Adolescents are prone to sleep problems that have unique developmental aspects and contribute to physical, emotional, and behavioural problems. Aims: This study evaluated an individualized, multicomponent intervention that considered developmental factors, and promoted age-appropriate autonomy in three adolescent females with disrupted sleep. Method: Adolescents recorded sleep data on daily logs. A nonconcurrent multiple baseline design was used to evaluate a cognitive-behavioural intervention including sleep hygiene training, bedtime routine development, cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, stimulus control, sleep restriction, bedtime fading, and problem-solving, along with clinically indicated individualization. Results: Outcomes demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements and decreased variability in sleep parameters following intervention. Each participant's sleep log data indicated improvement in, or maintenance of, adequate total sleep time (TST), decreased sleep onset latency (SOL), improved sleep efficiency (SE), improvement in time of sleep onset, and decreased or continued low frequency of night awakenings (NA). Anecdotally, adolescents and parents reported improvement in daytime functioning, coping, and sense of wellbeing. Conclusions: These cases highlight the potential for cognitive-behavioural interventions to facilitate healthy sleep in adolescents with challenging sleep problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465813000623

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendricks, M. C., Ward, C. M., Grodin, L. K., & Slifer, K. J.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hendricks, Melissa C.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2013-09-04
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
368-373
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2111470895
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
adolescent sleep problems, cognitive-behavioural intervention, sleep hygiene, bedtime routines, cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, stimulus control, sleep restriction, personalized interventions, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, nocturnal awakenings, total sleep time, adolescent girls, daytime functioning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Life Style, Relaxation Therapy, Sleep Deprivation, Health Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review