The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing nanocellulose to bulk materials: a review
Open accessAbstract
Various types of nanocellulose have been isolated from the cellulosic feedstock. It was expected that nanocellulose could be used to replace fossil-based plastic in certain areas because it is biodegradable, biocompatible, environment-friendly, and has outstanding performance. Unlike conventional plastic processing, nanocellulose is generally isolated and processed in aqueous environments. Therefore, dewatering and drying are essential unit operations for nanocellulose processing. Different drying methods for colloidal nanocellulose suspension mediated different self-assembly behaviors and thus resulted in different nanocellulose morphology and physical properties. The most utilized techniques for nanocellulose processing, such as spinning, vacuum/pressurized filtration, solvent casting and roll to roll casting, coating and roll to roll coating, and additive manufacturing are investigated. Process parameters such as temperature, pH, ion species, concentration, and external electrical field, affect the orientation and assembly behavior of nanocellulose, which in turn influence the properties of the prepared materials. Therefore, the method for assembling nanocellulose into bulk materials in a controlled way is vital for the properties of the fabricated nanocellulose composites. Here, some of the recent advances in the processing of nanocellulose for bulk materials are reviewed. Graphic abstract
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Markstedt, K., Mantas, A., Tournier, I., Martínez Ávila, H., Hägg, D., & Gatenholm, P. (2015) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 · Cited by 1,528
Dynamics of Cellulose Nanocrystal Alignment during 3D Printing
Hausmann, M. K., Rühs, P. A., Siqueira, G., Läuger, J., Libanori, R., Zimmermann, T., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02366 · Cited by 282
Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites
Leitner, J., Hinterstoisser, B., Wastyn, M., Keckes, J., & Gindl, W. (2007) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9131-2 · Cited by 231
Cited by
Recent Developments in Nanocellulose-Based Aerogels in Thermal Applications: A Review
Ahankari, S., Paliwal, P., Subhedar, A., & Kargarzadeh, H. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09678 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., Yao, Q., Liu, J., Sun, J., Zhu, Q., & Chen, H.
- Venue
- Cellulose
- Published
- 2019-07-24
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 13-14
- Pages
- 7585-7617
- ISSN
- 0969-0239 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-882X
- OpenAlex
- W2963158176
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing nanocellulose to bulk materials: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10570-019-02642-3
- The paper
- Wang, Q., Yao, Q., Liu, J., Sun, J., Zhu, Q., & Chen, H. (2019). Processing nanocellulose to bulk materials: a review. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02642-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.