Cited by 66Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGlutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms

Pharmacogenomics: Catechol-O-methyltransferase to thiopurine S-methyltransferase

Open access
Weinshilboum, Richard M.·2006·Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

1. Pharmacogenomics is the study of the role of inheritance in variation in the drug response phenotype-a phenotype that can vary from adverse drug reactions at one end of the spectrum to lack of therapeutic efficacy at the other. 2. The thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genetic polymorphism represents one of the best characterized and most clinically relevant examples of pharmacogenomics. This polymorphism has also served as a valuable "model system" for studies of the ways in which variation in DNA sequence might influence function. 3. The discovery and characterization of the TPMT polymorphism grew directly out of pharmacogenomic studies of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT), an enzyme discovered by Julius (Julie) Axelrod and his coworkers. 4. This review will outline the process by which common, functionally significant genetic polymorphisms for both COMT and TPMT were discovered and will use these two methyltransferase enzymes to illustrate general principles of pharmacogenomic research-both basic mechanistic and clinical translational research-principles that have been applied to a series of genes encoding methyltransferase enzymes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10571-006-9095-z

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinshilboum, R. M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Weinshilboum, Richard M.
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2006-06-29
Volume
26
Issue
4-6
Pages
537-559
ISSN
  • 0272-4340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6830
OpenAlex
W2020153758
Cited by
66
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U-01 GM61388, R01-GM-28157, R01 GM 35720, U01GM061388, R01GM028157, R01GM035720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
Keywords
pharmacogenomics, catechol-O-methyltransferase, thiopurine S-methyltransferase, genetic polymorphism, drug response variability, adverse drug reactions, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Animals, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Humans, Inactivation, Metabolic, Methylation, Methyltransferases, Models, Biological, Pharmacogenetics, Polymorphism, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review