The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)
Open accessAbstract
We investigate major results of the NARCCAP multiple regional climate model (RCM) experiments driven by multiple global climate models (GCMs) regarding climate change for seasonal temperature and precipitation over North America. We focus on two major questions: How do the RCM simulated climate changes differ from those of the parent GCMs and thus affect our perception of climate change over North America, and how important are the relative contributions of RCMs and GCMs to the uncertainty (variance explained) for different seasons and variables? The RCMs tend to produce stronger climate changes for precipitation: larger increases in the northern part of the domain in winter and greater decreases across a swath of the central part in summer, compared to the four GCMs driving the regional models as well as to the full set of CMIP3 GCM results. We pose some possible process-level mechanisms for the difference in intensity of change, particularly for summer. Detailed process-level studies will be necessary to establish mechanisms and credibility of these results. The GCMs explain more variance for winter temperature and the RCMs for summer temperature. The same is true for precipitation patterns. Thus, we recommend that future RCM-GCM experiments over this region include a balanced number of GCMs and RCMs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relationships between precipitation and surface temperature
Trenberth, K. E., & Shea, D. J. (2005) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2005gl022760 · Cited by 753 · cited 1×
“Trenberth and Shea (2005) found a negative correlation between warmseason temperature and precipitation in this region in observed data, suggesting that the correlation found in the RCM results is physically consistent.”
Result
Cited by
Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6
Mishra, V., Bhatia, U., & Tiwari, A. D. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00681-1 · Cited by 472
Kooperman, G. J., Pritchard, M. S., & Somerville, R. C. J. (2014) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1002/2014ms000306 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Mearns, L. O., Sain, S., Leung, L. R., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Biner, S., Caya, D., Arritt, R. W., Gutowski, W., Takle, E., Snyder, M., Jones, R. G., Nunes, A. M. B., Tucker, S., Herzmann, D., McDaniel, L., & Sloan, L.
- Venue
- Climatic Change
- Published
- 2013-07-27
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 965-975
- ISSN
- 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1480
- OpenAlex
- W1980903571
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10584-013-0831-3
- The paper
- Mearns, L. O., Sain, S., Leung, L. R., Bukovsky, M. S., McGinnis, S., Biner, S., Caya, D., Arritt, R. W., Gutowski, W., Takle, E., Snyder, M., Jones, R. G., Nunes, A. M. B., Tucker, S., Herzmann, D., McDaniel, L., & Sloan, L. (2013). Climate change projections of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP). Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0831-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.