The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change
Open accessAbstract
It has been argued that public doubts about climate change have been exacerbated by cold weather events seen as a form of disconfirming evidence for anticipated ‘warming’. Although a link between perceptions of climate and weather is well-established, such assumptions have not been empirically tested. Here we show, using nationally representative data, that directly following a period of severe cold weather in the UK, three times as many people saw these events as pointing towards the reality of climate change, than as disconfirming it. This we argue was a consequence of these cold winters being incorporated into a conceptualisation of extreme or ‘unnatural’ weather resulting from climate change. We also show that the way in which people interpret cold weather is associated with levels of pre-existing scepticism about climate change, which is in turn related to more general worldviews. Drawing attention to ‘extreme’ weather as a consequence of climate change can be a useful communication device, however this is problematic in the case of seasonal cold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Coumou, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1452 · Cited by 2,289
The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks
Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1080 · Cited by 680
Self-citationWhitmarsh, L. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506073088 · Cited by 448 · cited 3×
“An association between climate change and temperature increase or ‘heat’ is also frequently reported (Whitmarsh 2009; Smith and Leiserowitz 2012).”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
The Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12601 · Cited by 507
Extreme weather events and climate change concern
Konisky, D. M., Hughes, L., & Kaylor, C. H. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1555-3 · Cited by 367
van der Linden, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2008 · Cited by 316
Public engagement with marine climate change issues: (Re)framings, understandings and responses
Chilvers, J., Lorenzoni, I., Terry, G., Buckley, P., Pinnegar, J. K., & Gelcich, S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.006 · Cited by 70
Public understanding in Great Britain of ocean acidification
Capstick, S. B., Pidgeon, N. F., Corner, A. J., Spence, E. M., & Pearson, P. N. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3005 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Capstick, S. B., & Pidgeon, N. F.
- Venue
- Climatic Change
- Published
- 2014-01-08
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 695-708
- ISSN
- 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1480
- OpenAlex
- W2122381466
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 47.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10584-013-1003-1
- The paper
- Capstick, S. B., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014). Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1003-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.