Cited by 70Climate Change Communication and PerceptionRisk Perception and ManagementCoastal and Marine Management

Public engagement with marine climate change issues: (Re)framings, understandings and responses

Open access
Chilvers, Jason, Lorenzoni, Irene, Terry, Geraldine, Buckley, Paul, Pinnegar, John K., Gelcich, Stefan·2014·Global Environmental Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2016 the CDC and the National Indian Health Board created the Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative to support these efforts.

    “In 2016 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Indian Health Board created the Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative to support these efforts.”

    From How Indigenous Communities Are Adapting To Climate Change: Insights From The Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction discusses marine climate change, and the Discussion and conclusions addresses public responses to adaptation. Searches for “Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative” and for the CDC, National Indian Health Board, and 2016 found no passage about the claimed initiative or its creation. The cited paper is dated 2014; our copy does not address the claimed 2016 event. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The best practices and lessons learned from the funded tribes are shared widely, as are any relevant outputs such as communication products.

    “The best practices and lessons learned from the funded tribes are shared widely, as are any relevant outputs such as communication products.13”

    From How Indigenous Communities Are Adapting To Climate Change: Insights From The Climate-Ready Tribes Initiative (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion and conclusions section discusses public engagement with marine climate change and recommends ways to communicate about it. Our copy does not address funded tribes or say that their lessons learned and communication products are shared widely (searched: funded tribes, lessons learned, communication products, and dissemination). No page numbers were available for the passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 106 · Cited by 70

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [10]10. Bryman, A. (2004) Quantity and Quality in Social Science Research. New York: Routledge.
  2. [54]54. IPCC (2007b) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson (eds) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. [56]56. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G-K., Tignor, M.M.B, Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P.M. (eds) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. [57]57. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC WG2 AR5 Summary for policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. [59]59. Ipsos MORI Research Institute (2013) PREPARE -Climate risk acceptability -Findings from a series of deliberative workshops and online survey. Part of the PREPARE Programme of research on preparedness, adaptation and risk, Final Report for project ERG1211 by Ricardo-AEA for Defra.
  6. [60]60. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science. London: Routledge.
  7. [63]63. Kasemir, B., Jager, J., Jaeger, C.C., Gardner, M.T. (Eds.) Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Authors
Chilvers, J., Lorenzoni, I., Terry, G., Buckley, P., Pinnegar, J. K., & Gelcich, S.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Chilvers, Jason
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
29
Pages
165-179
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109911750
Cited by
70
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
22.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
EU's 7th Framework Program (FP7-2009-1-244132)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
ocean climate change, citizen participation, public understanding of climate change, framing, social dimensions of climate change, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, personal risk perception, citizen panels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review