Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale

Open access
Arnell, Nigel W., Gosling, Simon N.·2016·Climatic Change

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the implications of climate change for global river flood risk. It is based on the estimation of flood frequency relationships at a grid resolution of 0.5 × 0.5°, using a global hydrological model with climate scenarios derived from 21 climate models, together with projections of future population. Four indicators of the flood hazard are calculated; change in the magnitude and return period of flood peaks, flood-prone population and cropland exposed to substantial change in flood frequency, and a generalised measure of regional flood risk based on combining frequency curves with generic flood damage functions. Under one climate model, emissions and socioeconomic scenario (HadCM3 and SRES A1b), in 2050 the current 100-year flood would occur at least twice as frequently across 40 % of the globe, approximately 450 million flood-prone people and 430 thousand km 2 of flood-prone cropland would be exposed to a doubling of flood frequency, and global flood risk would increase by approximately 187 % over the risk in 2050 in the absence of climate change. There is strong regional variability (most adverse impacts would be in Asia), and considerable variability between climate models. In 2050, the range in increased exposure across 21 climate models under SRES A1b is 31–450 million people and 59 to 430 thousand km 2 of cropland, and the change in risk varies between −9 and +376 %. The paper presents impacts by region, and also presents relationships between change in global mean surface temperature and impacts on the global flood hazard. There are a number of caveats with the analysis; it is based on one global hydrological model only, the climate scenarios are constructed using pattern-scaling, and the precise impacts are sensitive to some of the assumptions in the definition and application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Arnell NW, Gosling SN (2013) The impacts of climate change on hydrological regimes at the global scale. J Hydrol 486:351–364 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arnell NW, Lloyd-Hughes B (2014) The global-scale impacts of climate change on water resources and flooding under new climate and socio-economic scenarios. Clim Chang 122:127–140 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bell VA et al (2007) Use of a grid-based hydrological model and regional climate model outputs to assess changing flood risk. Int J Climatol 27:1657–1671 · doi:10.1002/joc.1539
  4. Dankers R, Feyen L (2009) Flood hazard in Europe in an ensemble of regional climate scenarios. J Geophys Res Atmos 114. doi: 10.1029/2008jd011523 · DOI
  5. Dankers R et al (2013) A first look at changes in flood hazard in the ISI-MIP ensemble. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302078110 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Feyen L, Barredo JI, Dankers R (2009) Implications of global warming and urban land use change on flooding in Europe. In: Feyen J, Shannon K, Neville M (eds) Water and urban development paradigms—towards an integration of engineering, design and management approaches. CRC Press, London, pp 217–225
  7. Feyen L et al (2012) Fluvial flood risk in Europe in present and future climates. Clim Chang 112:47–62 · DOI
  8. Gosling SN, Arnell NW (2011) Simulating current global river runoff with a global hydrological model: model revisions, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Hydrol Process 25:1129–1145 · DOI
  9. Gosling SN et al (2010) Global hydrology modelling and uncertainty: running multiple ensembles with a campus grid. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:4005–4021 · DOI
  10. Haddeland I et al (2011) Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: setup and first results. J Hydrometeorol 12:869–884 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2013) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations: the CRU TS3.10 data set. Int J Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.3711 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Held I, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hirabayashi Y, Kanae S (2009) First estimate of the future global population at risk of flooding. Hydrol Res Lett 3:6–9 · DOI
  14. Hirabayashi Y et al (2008) Global projections of changing risks of floods and droughts in a changing climate. Hydrol Sci J 53:754–772 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hirabayashi Y et al (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Chang. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1911 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jongman B, Ward PJ, Aerts JCJH (2012) Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: long term trends and challenges. Glob Environ Chang 22:823–835 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kleinen T, Petschel-Held G (2007) Integrated assessment of changes in flooding probabilities due to climate change. Clim Chang 81:283–312 · DOI
  18. Lehner B et al (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental, integrated analysis. Clim Chang 75:273–299 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Meehl GA et al (2007a) The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset—a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Meehl GA et al (2007b) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S (ed) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  21. Meigh JR, Farquharson FAK, Sutcliffe JV (1997) A worldwide comparison of regional flood estimation methods and climate. Hydrol Sci J 42:225–244 · doi:10.1080/02626669709492022
  22. Milly PCD et al (2002) Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415:514–517 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling—an examination of the accuracy of the technique for describing future climates. Clim Chang 60:217–242 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Osborn TJ (2009) A user guide for ClimGen: a flexible tool for generating monthly climate data sets and scenarios. Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 17pp
  25. Pappenberger F et al (2012) Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:4143–4156 · DOI
  26. Peduzzi P et al (2009) Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the disaster risk index. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1149–1159 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Prudhomme C, Jakob D, Svensson C (2003) Uncertainty and climate change impact on the flood regime of small UK catchments. J Hydrol 277:1–23 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Tebaldi C, Arblaster JM (2014) Pattern-scaling: its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-1032-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. van Vuuren DP et al (2007) Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Clim Chang 81:119–159 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ward PJ et al (2013) Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results and sensitivity. Environ Res Lett 8:044019. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,121

Metadata

Authors
Arnell, N. W., & Gosling, S. N.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2014-03-06
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
387-401
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2041658927
Cited by
1,121
References
1
FWCI
24.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.