Cited by 211Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesClimate variability and modelsWater resources management and optimization

Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins

Open access
Hattermann, F. F., Krysanova, V., Gosling, S. N., Dankers, R., Daggupati, P., Donnelly, C., Flörke, M., Huang, S. +14 more·2017·Climatic Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-016-1829-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattermann, F. F., Krysanova, V., Gosling, S. N., Dankers, R., Daggupati, P., Donnelly, C., Flörke, M., Huang, S., Motovilov, Y., Buda, S., Yang, T., Müller, C., Leng, G., Tang, Q., Portmann, F. T., Hagemann, S., Gerten, D., Wada, Y., Masaki, Y., Alemayehu, T., Satoh, Y., & Samaniego, L.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Met Office (GB)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE)
  • University of Kassel (DE)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Hohai University (CN)
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Hattermann, F. F.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2017-01-04
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
561-576
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2568995074
Cited by
211
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01LS1201A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
climate change impacts, hydrological models, river discharge, model calibration and validation, large river basins, model uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review