Cited by 13Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Privacy preservation in the internet of vehicles using local differential privacy and IOTA ledger

Iftikhar, Zainab, Anjum, Adeel, Khan, Abid, Shah, Munam Ali, Jeon, Gwanggil·2023·Cluster Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10586-023-04002-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iftikhar, Z., Anjum, A., Khan, A., Shah, M. A., & Jeon, G.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
  • University of Derby (GB)
  • Incheon National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jeon, Gwanggil
Venue
Cluster Computing
Published
2023-05-08
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
3361-3377
ISSN
  • 1386-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7543
OpenAlex
W4375859381
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cluster Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
privacy preservation, vehicular ad hoc networks, local differential privacy, roadside units, untrusted third party, data immutability, quantum security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review