Cited by 67Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCultural Competency in Health CareMental Health Treatment and Access

Race and Ethnicity, Mental Health Services and Cultural Competence in the Criminal Justice System: Are we Ready to Change?

Primm, Annelle B., Osher, Fred C., Gomez, Marisela B.·2005·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

By the end of 2003, 3.2% of the U.S. adult population or 6.9 million adults were incarcerated, on probation or on parole. While non-whites constitute approximately 25% of the general U.S. population, they represent the majority of the prison (62%) and jail population (57%), a 33% increase since 1980. Approximately 15% of this prison and jail population has active symptoms of serious mental illness with two-thirds likely to have a co-occurring substance use disorder diagnosis. Meanwhile, the lack of adequate mental health and substance abuse treatment within all levels of the criminal justice system continues to exist. This is further exaggerated by the dearth of evidence showing appropriate cultural awareness and competence in delivery of these much needed services to a majority non-white population. This article will review the existing racial disparities present in the criminal justice system, the lack of appropriate psychiatric services, and the effect of cultural dissonance in service provision when services do exist. Policy implications and recommendations are included in the conclusion with a call for action to all agencies directly and indirectly affected by this multifaceted problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-005-6361-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within jails, prisons, and other carceral settings, mental health and substance abuse treatment services are scarce, and those that exist are not usually attuned to the cultural needs of people of color.

    “Within jails, prisons, and other carceral settings, mental health and substance abuse treatment services are scarce, and those that do exist are not usually attuned to the cultural needs of people of color (Fader, 2013; Primm et al., 2005).”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Primm et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Primm, A. B., Osher, F. C., & Gomez, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Primm, Annelle B.
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2005-10
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
557-569
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W1980323746
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
race and ethnicity, mental health services, cultural competence, criminal justice system, prison population, racial disparities, severe mental illness, substance use disorders, co-occurring disorders, jails, community supervision, policy recommendations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Criminal Law, Cultural Characteristics, Ethnicity, Humans, Mental Health Services, Prisons, Public Policy, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Substance-Related Disorders, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review