Cited by 23Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceHealth Policy Implementation Science

Investigating adherence promoters in evidence-based mental health interventions with children and adolescents

Gearing, Robin E., Schwalbe, Craig S., Dweck, Pauline, Berkowitz, Jessica·2012·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

The effectiveness of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) interventions in child and adolescent mental health is undermined by poor client adherence to treatment protocols. To counter this trend, adherence promoters, supplemental interventions to facilitate client adherence to treatment protocols, have evolved to increase adherence. This study investigates patterns of adherence promoting interventions employed in conjunction with RCT of interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems. An 85 question survey on adherence promoters was sent to 85 researchers who published randomized controlled trials on three psychosocial interventions (Cognitive Behavioral Therapies (CBT), Interpersonal Therapy (IPT), and Psychoeducational (PE)) in the area of child and adolescent mental health, between January 2000 and March 31, 2008. Forty-six (54%) researchers completed the survey. Most researchers reported using multiple adherence promoting interventions throughout the duration of their studies. The intensity of adherence promoting efforts was increased for interventions targeting disruptive behavior disorders and for family based interventions. On average, respondents reported using little more than one promoter per session and devoting approximately 12 min per session on all adherence promoters. Clinical researchers expend considerable resources in active efforts to promote adherence to treatment among research participants. Findings of this study support best practice literature on adherence promotion and open new avenues for research into the adherence to evidence-based interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-011-9394-9

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gearing, R. E., Schwalbe, C. S., Dweck, P., & Berkowitz, J.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Gearing, Robin E.
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2011-03-11
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
63-70
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W1969523586
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
medication adherence, child and adolescent mental health, evidence-based practice, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychoeducation, disruptive behavior disorders, family intervention, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review