Cited by 20Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Electronic Health Records: Eliciting Behavioral Health Providers’ Beliefs

Shank, Nancy, Willborn, Elizabeth, PytlikZillig, Lisa, Noel, HarmoniJoie·2012·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Interviews with 32 community behavioral health providers elicited perceived benefits and barriers of using electronic health records. Themes identified were (a) quality of care, (b) privacy and security, and (c) delivery of services. Benefits to quality of care were mentioned by 100% of the providers, and barriers by 59% of providers. Barriers involving privacy and security concerns were mentioned by 100% of providers, and benefits by 22%. Barriers to delivery of services were mentioned by 97% of providers, and benefits by 66%. Most providers (81%) expressed overall positive support for electronic behavioral health records.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-011-9409-6

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shank, N., Willborn, E., PytlikZillig, L., & Noel, H.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Shank, Nancy
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2011-05-15
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
249-254
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2067824996
Cited by
20
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS017838)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health records, behavioral health providers, provider beliefs, perceived benefits and barriers, quality of care, privacy and security, service delivery, community mental health, technology adoption
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Behavioral Medicine, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Nebraska, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review