Cited by 24Family Caregiving in Mental IllnessMental Health and Patient InvolvementFamily and Disability Support Research

Carers' hope, wellbeing and attitudes regarding recovery

Marshall, Sarah, Deane, Frank, Crowe, Trevor, White, Angela, Kavanagh, David·2013·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Carers are important to the recovery of their relatives with serious mental disorder however, it is unclear whether they are aware of, or endorse recent conceptualisations of recovery. This study compared carers' and mental health workers' recovery attitudes, and undertook multivariate predictions of carers' wellbeing, hopefulness and recovery attitudes. Participants were 82 Australian family members caring for a relative with psychosis. Carers' average recovery attitudes were less optimistic than for previously surveyed staff. Carers' recovery attitudes were predicted by perceptions that their relative's negative symptoms were more severe. Hopefulness and wellbeing was predicted by more positive and less negative caregiving experiences. Hopefulness was also predicted by less frequent contacts with their affected relative, and unexpectedly, by perceptions of more severe psychotic symptoms. Carers' wellbeing was further predicted by having a partner and having no lifetime history of a mental disorder. Hope and wellbeing are affected by everyday challenges and positive experiences of caregiving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-012-9568-0

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, S., Deane, F., Crowe, T., White, A., & Kavanagh, D.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Sarah
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
344-353
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2022925235
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
caregivers, hope, well-being, recovery attitudes, severe mental illness, psychosis, family caregivers, caregiver experiences, negative symptoms, mental health professionals, partner status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Australia, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review