The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916595275005 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030 · Cited by 951
Sustainability marketing research: past, present and future
McDonagh, P., & Prothero, A. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2014.943263 · Cited by 393
Geiger, S. M., Fischer, D., & Schrader, U. (2018) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.1688 · Cited by 312
(2023) · Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.004 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Csutora, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Policy
- Published
- 2012-02-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-163
- ISSN
- 0168-7034 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0700
- OpenAlex
- W2085452633
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8
- The paper
- Csutora, M. (2012). One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour–Impact Gap Problem. Journal of Consumer Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
