Cited by 76Problem Solving Skills DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric properties of the social problem solving inventory-revised short-form: is the short form a valid and reliable measure for young adults?

Hawkins, Deanne, Sofronoff, Kate, Sheffield, Jeanie·2009·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-008-9209-7

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised has good internal consistency and test-retest reliability in a previous validation study.

    “The SPSI‐R:SF possesses good levels of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, with internal consistency coefficients ranging from 0.73 for ICS; 0.80 for RPS; 0.82 for PPO; to 0.86 for both NPO and AS, shown in a previous validation study (Hawkins, Sofronoff, & Sheffield., 2009).”
  • The NPO subscale of the SPSI-R-SF has been shown to yield a Cronbach's alpha level of 0.83-0.86 and a test-retest reliability of 0.79 over a three week period in adults.

    “The NPO subscale has been shown to yield a Cronbach's alpha level of 0.83-0.86 and a test-retest reliability of 0.79 over a three week period in adults (D'Zurilla et al., 2002;Hawkins, Sofronoff, & Sheffield, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkins, D., Sofronoff, K., & Sheffield, J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Sofronoff, Kate
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2008-08-20
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
462-470
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2001189075
Cited by
76
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
social problem-solving ability, psychometric properties, young adults, university students, convergent validity, discriminant validity, reliability statistics, depressive symptoms, self-report measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review