The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ): Scale Development and Psychometric Characteristics
Open accessAbstract
Despite the popularity of emotion regulation in the contemporary literature, research has almost exclusively focused on only intrapersonal processes, whereas much less attention has been placed in interpersonal emotion regulation processes. In order to encourage research on interpersonal emotion regulation, we present a series of 4 studies to develop the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ). The final scale consists of 20 items with 4 factors containing 5 items each. The 4 factors are: Enhancing Positive Affect; Perspective Taking; Soothing; and Social Modeling. The scale shows excellent psychometric characteristics. Implications for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“individual differences in interpersonal ER skills, such as becoming dependent on others or social settings to regulate one’s own emotions (e.g., through excessive reassurance or advice seeking)20,26 have been shown to predict depressive and anxiety symptoms in adults.19,27”
From A meta-analysis of emotional regulation outcomes in psychological interventions for youth with depression and anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“We considered several assessment measures related to expert reviews of interpersonal ER19,20,27,68; however, we were unable to locate any intervention trials that utilized these measures.”
From A meta-analysis of emotional regulation outcomes in psychological interventions for youth with depression and anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929 · cited 5×
“Results of empirical investigations have so far converged to suggest that antecedent-focused strategies are relatively effective methods of regulating emotion in the short-term, whereas response-focused strategies tend to be counterproductive in laboratory experiments (e.g., Gross & John, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spielberger, C. D., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults: Manual and Sample: Manual. Instrument and Scoring Guide: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion regulation: a transdiagnostic perspective on a new RDoC domain
Fernandez, K. C., Jazaieri, H., & Gross, J. J. (2016) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-016-9772-2 · Cited by 329
Polizzi, C. P., & Lynn, S. J. (2021) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10186-1 · Cited by 148
Daros, A. R., Haefner, S. A., Asadi, S., Kazi, S., Rodak, T., & Quilty, L. C. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01191-9 · Cited by 136
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation: A Review of Social and Developmental Components
Barthel, A. L., Hay, A. C., Doan, S. N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2018.19 · Cited by 142
Self-citationVirtual Reality for the Enhancement of Emotion Regulation
Colombo, D., Díaz‐García, A., Fernandez‐Álvarez, J., & Botella, C. (2021) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2618 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Hofmann, S. G., Carpenter, J. K., & Curtiss, J.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hofmann, Stefan G.
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 2016-01-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-356
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- PMC
- PMC4864994
- OpenAlex
- W2333998128
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (R01AT007257)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- interpersonal emotion regulation, scale development, psychometric properties, perspective taking, soothing, social modeling, interpersonal processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
