Coordinating individual and organisational responses to fraud
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The reporting rate for fraud is even lower in an online context.
“This is further asserted to be even lower in an online context (Smith, 2007(Smith, , 2008)).”
From Romance baiting, cryptorom and 'pig butchering': an evolutionary step in romance fraud (2024) · cites this paper as Smith, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud
Cross, C. (2015) · International Review of Victimology · doi:10.1177/0269758015571471 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Romance baiting, cryptorom and 'pig butchering': an evolutionary step in romance fraud
Cross, C. (2024) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2023.2248670 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“This is further asserted to be even lower in an online context (Smith, 2007, 2008).”
Victims’ motivations for reporting to the ‘fraud justice network’
Cross, C. (2018) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2018.1507891 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“What action should l take?”: Help-seeking behaviours of those targeted by romance fraud
Meikle, W., & Cross, C. (2024) · Journal of Economic Criminology · doi:10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100054 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Smith, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Australian Institute of Criminology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Russell G.
- ORCID
- Smith, Russell G.
- Venue
- Crime, Law and Social Change
- Published
- 2008-05-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 379-396
- ISSN
- 0378-1100 (ISSN-L)
- 0925-4994
- 1573-0751
- OpenAlex
- W1993936379
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Crime Law and Social Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Keywords
- fraud, fraud reporting, barriers to reporting, fraud prevention, public-private coordination, national coordination, Australia, dishonesty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
