Cited by 22Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCriminal Justice and PenologySexual Assault and Victimization Studies

“What action should l take?”: Help-seeking behaviours of those targeted by romance fraud

Open access
Meikle, Wesley, Cross, Cassandra·2024·Journal of Economic Criminology

Abstract

Fraud uses deception to obtain a financial reward from its victim. There are strong negative stereotypes and victim blaming discourses towards fraud victims, with research indicating that fraud victims are unlikely to report incidents for many reasons, including a high degree of shame and stigmatisation. In this way, it can be assumed that fraud victims are averse to seeking help in the aftermath of an incident. Drawing from romance fraud reports lodged with Scamwatch (an Australian online reporting portal for fraud) between 1 July 2018 and 31 July 2019, this article examines the help-seeking behaviours of those targeted by romance fraud. The analysis found a variety of explicit and implicit help-seeking behaviours, encompassing both personal justice and altruistic reasons. The analysis demonstrates that despite the victim blaming that exists, this did not always act as a barrier to reporting or requesting help. Overall, this article challenges some of the perceived aversity to help-seeking behaviour of fraud victims. It also provides a foundation for improving responses and support to those who actively engage in help-seeking behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100054

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Victim blaming deepens the harmful consequences of online romance scams and raises the threshold for victims to report their experiences to the police or other authorities.

    “This phenomenon of victim blaming—not only placing responsibility on the victim for what happened but also questioning their judgment—deepens the harmful consequences of the scam and raises the threshold for victims to report their experiences to the police or other authorities (Meikle & Cross, 2024).”

    From Love as Bait: A Scoping Review and Crime Script Analysis of Online Romance Scams (2026) · cites this paper as Meikle & Cross, 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meikle, W., & Cross, C.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Cross, Cassandra
Venue
Journal of Economic Criminology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
3
Pages
100054
ISSN
2949-7914 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391543512
Cited by
22
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
romance fraud, help-seeking, fraud victims, victim blaming, stigmatization, fraud reporting, online dating fraud, victim support, personal justice, altruism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review