Nobody trusts them! Under- and over-policing Native American Communities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent.
“Native Americans are often stereotyped as disreputable others, characterized as lazy, alcoholic, and violent (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Holmes & Antell 2005, Perry 2006, Snipp 1992).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
In the context of tensions and strains of settler colonialism that characterize relations between Native Americans and larger US society, there are direct links between Native American oppression and negative stereotypes of Native Americans.
“In the context of tensions and strains of settler colonialism that characterize relations between Native Americans and larger US society, there are direct links between Native American oppression and negative stereotypes of Native Americans (Franklin 2013, Lieber 1994, Perry 2006, Rouse & Hanson 1991).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias.
“Others have argued that negative stereotypes of Native Americans have perpetuated and encouraged general anti-Native American criminal justice system bias (Alvarez & Bachman 1996, Lieber et al. 2007, Perry 2006, Rouse & Hanson 1991, Zatz et al. 1991).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Many criticisms of PL 280 as a limitation to tribal sovereignty exist.
“This coincides with many criticisms of PL 280 as a limitation to tribal sovereignty (Perry 2006, Snipp 1992).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
For Native people, spatial policing can mean being policed when exiting their Native Nations, their reservation communities.
“For Native people, this can mean being policed when exiting their Native Nations, their reservation communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009)).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
The catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development.
“While the catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development, studies have nonetheless been conducted demonstrating the disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people (see Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;Tighe 2014;Mebane-Cruz 2015;Cunne”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Studies have been conducted demonstrating disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people.
“While the catalog of research on Native carceral inequalities in the US is still in the early stages of development, studies have nonetheless been conducted demonstrating the disparities in carceral system involvement and outcomes faced by Native people (see Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;Tighe 2014;Mebane-Cruz 2015;Cunne”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Interviews have indicated experiences of at best culturally inept, and at worst outright dismissive, even racist behavior from non-tribal law enforcement within Native communities.
“Beyond the jurisdictional confusions, interviews have indicated experiences of at best culturally inept, and at worst outright dismissive, even racist behavior from non-tribal law enforcement within Native communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009)).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
A general sense of suspicion and hostility from law enforcement has been reported among interviewed Native populations within the reservation system.
“Overall, a general sense of suspicion and hostility from law enforcement has been reported among interviewed Native populations within the reservation system (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
These studies implicate overarching US settler colonial structural factors common to Native individuals and communities which enable, if not entail, these inequalities as part-and-parcel of maintaining settler colonial and capitalist stratifications.
“Further, these studies implicate the overarching US settler colonial structural factors common to Native individuals and communities which enable, if not entail, these inequalities as part-andparcel of maintaining the stratifications that settler colonial (and capitalist) power depend upon (Munoz and McMorris 2002;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Jeffries and Bond 2012;Janisch 2014;Saperstein et al. 2014;T”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
This expectation of suspicion and hostility contributes to the lack of desire for law enforcement involvement, even where necessary, within many Native communities.
“This expectation of suspicion and hostility contributes to the lack of desire for law enforcement involvement, even where necessary, within many Native communities (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
This spatial policing is felt as a type of enforced segregation.
“This spatial policing is felt as a type of enforced segregation (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Koshy et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Much research on Native carceral system inequalities has been conducted within particular geopolitical contexts rather than across broad populations.
“It is important to note that much research on Native carceral system inequalities have been conducted within particular geopolitical contexts (i.e., particular US states and/or regions) rather than across broad populations (such as the entire US) (e.g.: Tighe 2014; Stewart et al. 2022;Perry 2006Perry , 2009;;Munoz and McMorris 2002).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Native people have experienced greater scrutiny from police as suspects.
“Further, Native people have experienced greater scrutiny from police as suspects (Perry 2006;Koshy et al. 2022;Lantz and Ward 2023) and harsher penalties, specifically for property and person crimes against white people compared to the white individuals who committed crimes against Native people.”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
This finding must be contextualized in light of the evidence of overpolicing of Native people, which increases the chance of carceral system involvement among Native people.
“However, this finding must be contextualized in light of the evidence of overpolicing of Native people (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Lantz and Ward 2023), which thus increases the chance of carceral system involvement among Native people.”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
It is argued that ultimately crimes implicating white victims are the target of more severe penalties for Native offenders.
“Thus, it is argued that ultimately it is crimes implicating white victims that are the target of more severe penalties for Native offenders (Perry 2006(Perry , 2009;;Nielson and Jarratt-Snider 2018;Stewart et al. 2022).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Federal criminal justice powers over Indian Country, complex jurisdictional authority in Indian Country, racial profiling, and overpolicing in Indian Country are cited across research as key factors contributing to the disparate carceral system experiences of Native individuals.
“Federal criminal justice powers over Indian Country, the complex maze of jurisdictional authority in Indian Country, racial profiling, and overpolicing in Indian Country are cited across research as key factors contributing to the disparate carceral system experiences of Native individuals”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
Negative stereotypes perceiving Native people as inherently violent and intemperate reinforce and compel their experiences of increased scrutiny and punitiveness within the US carceral system.
“the obviously negative stereotypes perceiving Native people as inherently violent and intemperate reinforce and compel their experiences of increased scrutiny”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Perry 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Perry, B.
- Affiliations
- Ontario Tech University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Perry, Barbara
- Venue
- Critical Criminology
- Published
- 2006-09-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 411-444
- ISSN
- 0847-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1205-8629
- 1572-9877
- OpenAlex
- W1978676624
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- Native American tribes, police-community relations, over-enforcement, racial violence, police brutality, public trust in police, victimization, American Indian nations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review