Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 38Risk and Portfolio OptimizationAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online portfolio selection strategy based on combining experts' advice

Zhang, Yong, Yang, Xingyu·2017·Computational Economics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10614-016-9585-0

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li, B., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2012). On-line portfolio selection: A survey. In Proceedings of CoRR.
  2. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 8, 77–91.

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., & Yang, X.
Affiliations
Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Xingyu
Venue
Computational Economics
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
141-159
ISSN
  • 0927-7099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9974
OpenAlex
W2398342468
Cited by
38
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Computational Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • 125 planning for the development of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Guangzhou (15G29)
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (71501049)
  • Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (13YJC630234, 11YJC630255)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71301029)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
online portfolio selection, expert advice, stock selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.