Cited by 13Connective tissue disorders researchVascular anomalies and interventionsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Audit of Gastrointestinal Manifestations in Patients with Loeys–Dietz Syndrome and Vascular Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome

Open access
Wang, Xiao Jing, Babameto, Mary, Babovic-Vuksanovic, Dusica, Bowen, Juan M., Camilleri, Michael·2021·Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Abstract

Objectives Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) and vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (vEDS) are genetically heterogeneous heritable disorders of connective tissue. Both are multi-system disorders with dominant vascular pathology and associated gastrointestinal manifestations.Aim To summarize the abdominal manifestations found in these two disorders in a cohort of patients seen at Mayo Clinic during a period of 25 years.Methods Data were collected via the advanced cohort explorer (ACE) of Mayo Clinic records from 1994 to 2018 in patients with vEDS or LDS confirmed by genetic testing and/or medical genetics consultation. We extracted information concerning gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal hernias, and vascular manifestations or complications.Results We identified and reviewed records of 68 vEDS and 13 LDS patients. Patients were similar in age at diagnosis and gender distribution. Gastrointestinal symptoms were frequently reported in both disorders and largely similar, although altered bowel function was more prevalent in LDS patients. Hernias were present in similar proportions of patients with vEDS and LDS; however, ventral hernias were more frequent and more likely to be postoperative in vEDS than LDS. LDS patients had more arterial aneurysms overall (76.9% LDS vs. 58% vEDS, p = 0.02) and a higher proportion required arterial repair (69.2% LDS vs. 32.7% vEDS S, p = 0.03). Co-morbidities of autonomic dysfunction, psychopathology (most commonly anxiety, depression, adjustment disorder), and allergy were more prevalent in LDS than vEDS.Conclusion Patients with vEDS and LDS had a propensity for gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal hernias, and aneurysm formation, but repair for arterial rupture was more prevalent in LDS than EDS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10620-020-06265-8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orthostatic intolerance was prevalent in 35.9% (95% CI 26.6-46.4, seven studies) of patients with hEDS/HSD.

    “Finally, we found that orthostatic intolerance was prevalent in 35.9% (95% CI 26.6–46.4, seven studies [10, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28]) of patients with hEDS/HSD, with considerable heterogeneity in the analysis (I 2 = 96.4, p = 0.0001) (Figure S44).”

    From Meta-Analysis: Chronic Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Comorbidities in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results > Comorbid Conditions section (page unavailable) includes orthostatic intolerance within autonomic dysfunction, so the paper addresses the outcome. But its patients had vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome or Loeys–Dietz syndrome, not hEDS/HSD, and it does not report the pooled 35.9% estimate or its confidence interval. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X. J., Babameto, M., Babovic-Vuksanovic, D., Bowen, J. M., & Camilleri, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Camilleri, Michael
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2020-04-18
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
1142-1152
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
OpenAlex
W3017312371
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-DK115950, R01-DK67071)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Loeys-Dietz syndrome, vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, gastrointestinal manifestations, abdominal wall hernia, ventral hernia, arterial aneurysm, arterial reconstruction, autonomic dysfunction, anxiety, depression, allergy, connective tissue diseases
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Genetic Variation, Cohort Studies, Collagen Type III, Clinical Audit, Young Adult, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review