CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antiracism: a neoliberal alternative to a left

Reed, Adolph·2018·Dialectical Anthropology
DOI 10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. A. Philip Randolph Institute. 1966. A “Freedom Budget” for all Americans: Budgeting our resources 1965–1975 to achieve “Freedom From Want.”. New York: APRI.
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  3. Cruse, Harold. 1968. Rebellion or revolution? New York: William Morrow.
  4. Fields, Barbara. 1990. Slavery, race, and ideology in the United States of America. New Left Review 181: 95–118.
  5. Kerstein, Andrew, and David Lucander, eds. 2014. For jobs and freedom: Selected speeches and writings of A. Philip Randolph. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  6. Le Blanc, Paul, and Michael D. Yates. 2013. A freedom budget for all Americans. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  7. Logan, Rayford, ed. 1944. What the negro wants. Chapel Hill: N.C. University of North Carolina Press.
  8. Loveman, Mara. 1999. Is ‘race’ essential? American Sociological Review 64: 891–898. · DOI
  9. Reed, Adolph Jr. 2017a. “The Kerner Commission and the irony of antiracist politics.” Labor: Studies in Working-Class History 14 Winter: 31–37. · DOI
  10. Reed, Adolph Jr. 2016a. The black-labor-left alliance in the neoliberal age. New Labor Forum 25: 28–34. · DOI
  11. Reed, Adolph Jr. 2016b. The post-1965 trajectory of race, class, and urban politics in the U. S. reconsidered. Labor Studies Journal 41 Fall: 260–291. · DOI
  12. Reed, Adolph Jr. 2004. The study of Black politics and the practice of Black politics: Their historical relation and evolution. In Problems and methods in the study of politics, ed. Ian Shapiro, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek Masoud, 106–143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  13. Reed, Adolph Jr, and Merlin Chowkwanyun. 2012. Race, class, crisis: The discourse of racial disparity and its analytical discontents. Socialist Register 48: 149–175.
  14. Reed, Touré F. 2018. Why liberals separate race from class: The conservative implications of race reductionism. New York & London: Verso.
  15. Sheinin, Aaron Gould. 2016. “John Lewis on Bernie Sanders: ‘There’s not anything free in America.” Atlanta Journal-Constitution. February 17 at http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2016/02/17/john-lewis-on-bernie-sanders-nothing-free-in-america/ .
  16. Warren, Kenneth. 2012. What was African American literature? Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press. · DOI
  17. Warren, Kenneth. 2003. So black and blue: Ralph Ellison and the occasion of criticism. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Reed, A.
Venue
Dialectical Anthropology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-05-22
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
105-115
ISSN
  • 0304-4092
  • 1573-0786
DOI
10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3
Cited by
37
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review