Cited by 19Engineering Education and PedagogyDesign Education and PracticeBiomedical and Engineering Education

Developing an innovator’s thinking in engineering education

Solodikhina, Аnna, Solodikhina, Мaria·2022·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-021-10709-7

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solodikhina, А., & Solodikhina, М.
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2021-08-27
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
2569-2584
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W3196991303
Cited by
16
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
Keywords
engineering education, design thinking, business thinking, STEM education, entrepreneurship education, case-based learning, startup project, technological innovation, student motivation, achievement motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review