Cited by 6

Computer science and non-computer science faculty members' perception on teaching data science via an experiential learning platform

Chen, Huan, Wang, Ye, Li, You, Lee, Yugyung, Petri, Alexis, Cha, Teryn·2023·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-022-11326-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI can provide instructors and students with new, rich, and personalized materials, contributing to curriculum design and development and facilitation of course preparation.

    “Both studies conducted focus group interviews, and revealed that AI, at curriculum levels, could provide instructors and students with new, rich, and personalized materials, contributing to curriculum design and development and facilitation of course preparation.”
  • Inconsistent definitions of data science, inadequate team support, and lack of collaboration platforms were major challenges for faculty members in data science.

    “Chen et al. (2023) interviewed 16 faculty members in data science and revealed that inconsistent definitions of data science, inadequate team support, and lack of collaboration platforms were major challenges.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Lee, Y., Petri, A., & Cha, T.
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2022-10-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
4093-4108
ISSN
  • 1360-2357
  • 1573-7608
Cited by
6
References
5
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF IUSE #1935076)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review