Cited by 8Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareProblem and Project Based LearningTeaching and Learning Programming

Enhancing problem-based learning with computational thinking concepts for nursing students in virtual simulation context: Bridging knowledge and practice

Lin, Pei-Hsuan, Huang, Po-Sen, Geng, Ying, Huang, Yueh-Min·2024·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-024-12661-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, P.-H., Huang, P.-S., Geng, Y., & Huang, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • National Taichung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Tajen University (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Yueh-Min
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2024-04-19
Volume
29
Issue
15
Pages
20409-20429
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W4394962736
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
problem-based learning, computational thinking, nursing students, virtual simulation, academic-practice gap, self-efficacy, problem-solving skills, clinical skills development, nursing education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review