Managing Permit Markets to Stabilize Prices
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Cronshaw, Mark B., and Jamie Brown Kruse. 1996. Regulated Firms in Pollution Permit Markets with Banking. Journal of Regulatory Economics 9:179-189.
- Hoel, M., and L. Karp. 2001. Taxes and Quotas for a Stock Pollutant with Multiplicative Uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics 82 (1):91-114.
- Keohane, Nathaniel O., Richard L. Revesz, and Robert N. Stavins. 1998. The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy. Harvard Environmental Law Review 22:313-367.
- Kling, Catherine, and Jonathan Rubin. 1997. Bankable Permits for the Control of Environmental Pollution. Journal of Public Economics 64 (1):101-15.
- McKibbin, Warwick J., M. Ross, R. Shackleton, and P. Wilcoxen. 1999. Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Journal Special Issue.
- Newell, Richard, and William Pizer. 2003. Regulating Stock Externalities Under Uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45:416-432.
- Roberts, Marc J., and Michael Spence. 1976. Effluent Charges and Licenses Under Uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics 5 (3-4):193-208.
- Rubin, Jonathon D. 1996. A Model of Intertemporal Emision Trading, Banking, and Borrowing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31:269-286.
- Rubin, Jonathon, and Catherine Kling. 1993. An Emission Saved is an Emission Earned: An Empirical Study of Emission Banking for Light-Duty Vehicle Manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25:257-274.
- Schennach, Susanne M. 2000. The Economics of Pollution Permit Banking in the Context of Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 (3):189-210.
- Weitzman, Martin L. 1974. Prices vs. Quantities. Review of Economic Studies 41 (4):477-491.
- ---. 1978. Optimal Rewards for Economic Regulation. American Economic Review 68 (4):683-691.
- Wiener, Jonathan. 1998. Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context. Yale Law Journal 677:108.
- Yates, Andrew J., and Mark B. Cronshaw. 2001. Pollution Permit Markets with Intertemporal trading and Assymetric Information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42:104-118.
- Yohe, Gary W. 1978. Towards a General Comparison of Price Controls and Quantity Controls under Uncertainty. The Review of Economic Studies 45 (2):229-38.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perino, G., Ritz, R., & van Benthem, A. (2019) · doi:10.3386/w25643 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The Market Stability Reserve in the EU Emissions Trading System: A Critical Review
Borghesi, S., Pahle, M., Perino, G., Quemin, S., & Willner, M. (2023) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-030145 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Although previous theoretical (Roberts & Spence 1976, Pizer 2002, Newell et al. 2005, Murray et al. 2009, Burtraw et al. 2022) and most practical [Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), California’s cap-and-trade program] attempts at managing allowance markets have explicitly defined allowance…”
BackgroundLinking permit markets multilaterally
Doda, B., Quemin, S., & Taschini, L. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102259 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Karp, L. S., & Traeger, C. P. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3798938 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Newell, R., Pizer, W., & Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Resources For The Future (US)
- Corresponding author
- Newell, Richard
- Venue
- Environmental & Resource Economics
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-157
- ISSN
- 0924-6460 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1502
- OpenAlex
- W2110651674
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ageconsearch.umn.edu
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental and Resource Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- tradable permits, permit markets, price stabilization, cost uncertainty, abatement costs, greenhouse gas emissions, environmental policy instruments, political economy of environmental policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
